2019
DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncz036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose Benchmarks for Paediatric Head Computed Tomography Examination in Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Radiation dose for FD, LD1, and LD2 image series was calculated using the dose length product (DLP)—conversion factor method, where the effective dose E = DLP *anatomic area conversion factor. 7,20…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiation dose for FD, LD1, and LD2 image series was calculated using the dose length product (DLP)—conversion factor method, where the effective dose E = DLP *anatomic area conversion factor. 7,20…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pattern repeated itself in the 75th percentile of median values for CTDIvol (60/62 mGy) and DLP (1210/1288 mGy-cm). The mean is useful for inter-facility peer review, while the 75th percentile is useful for benchmarking [10]. Further interrogation of the mean with a paired-sample t-test gave a statistically significant difference in the CTDIvol (p = 0.001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, effective dose, an indicator of risk from ionizing radiation, is generally calculated from DLP [10,19]. So, good practice with CTDIvol does not necessarily translate to optimum radiation protection for the patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations