Dose conformity of gamma knife radiosurgery and risk factors for complications

The objective was to evaluate the performance of a high‐definition multileaf collimator (MLC) of 2.5 mm leaf width (MLC2.5) and compare to standard 5 mm leaf width MLC (MLC5) for the treatment of intracranial lesions using dynamic conformal arcs (DCA) technique with a dedicated radiosurgery linear accelerator. Simulated cases of spherical targets were created to study solely the effect of target volume size on the performance of the two MLC systems independent of target shape complexity. In addition, 43 patients previously treated for intracranial lesions in our institution were retrospectively planned using DCA technique with MLC2.5 and MLC5 systems. The gross tumor volume ranged from 0.07 to 40.57 cm3 with an average volume of 5.9 cm3. All treatment parameters were kept the same for both MLC‐based plans. The plan evaluation was performed using figures of merits (FOM) for a rapid and objective assessment on the quality of the two treatment plans for MLC2.5 and MLC5. The prescription isodose surface was selected as the greatest isodose surface covering ≥95% of the target volume and delivering 95% of the prescription dose to 99% of target volume. A Conformity Index (CI) and conformity distance index (CDI) were used to quantifying the dose conformity to a target volume. To assess normal tissue sparing, a normal tissue difference (NTD) was defined as the difference between the volume of normal tissue receiving a certain dose utilizing MLC5 and the volume receiving the same dose using MLC2.5. The CI and normal tissue sparing for the simulated spherical targets were better with the MLC2.5 as compared to MLC5. For the clinical patients, the CI and CDI results indicated that the MLC2.5 provides better treatment conformity than MLC5 even at large target volumes. The CI's range was 1.15 to 2.44 with a median of 1.59 for MLC2.5 compared to 1.60–2.85 with a median of 1.71 for MLC5. Improved normal tissue sparing was also observed for MLC2.5 over MLC5, with the NTD always positive, indicating improvement, and ranging from 0.1 to 8.3 for normal tissue receiving 50% (NTV50), 70% (NTV70) and 90% (NTV90) of the prescription dose. The MLC2.5 has a dosimetric advantage over the MLC5 in Linac‐based radiosurgery using DCA method for intracranial lesions, both in treatment conformity and normal tissue sparing when target shape complexity increases.PACS number: 87.56J‐, 87.56 jk

P I T V = \frac{P I V}{T V}

…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Paddick's Conformity CI was modified by Nakamura et al ( 7 ) and expressed as follows:

C I = \frac{P I V / P V T V}{P V T V / T V}

…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Dosimetric performance of the new high‐definition multileaf collimator for intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery

Dhabaan

Elder

Schreibmann

et al. 2010

“…Target dose conformity and homogeneity are also compared using conformity index (CI), new conformity index (nCI) and homogeneity index (HI) parameters. The new conformity index, nCI, is calculated using the formula developed by Paddick (11) and Nakamura et al, (12) and it is given by the formula:

nCI = {(TV) \times ({normalV}_{RI})} / {({TV}_{RI})}^{2}

where TV is the volume of the PTV and

V_{RI}

is the overall volume covered by the reference prescription isodose.

{TV}_{RI}

is the volume of the PTV covered by the reference prescription isodose.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A phantom study to determine the optimum size of a single collimator for shortening the treatment time in CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery of spherical targets

Harikrishnaperumal

Gopalakrishna

Murali

et al. 2012

Prolonged treatment execution time is a concern in CyberKnife robotic radiosurgery. Beam reduction and node reduction technique, and monitor unit optimization methods are adopted to reduce the treatment time. Usage of single collimator in the CyberKnife treatment plan can potentially reduce collimator exchange time. An optimal single collimator, which yields an acceptable dose distribution along with minimum number of nodes, beams, and monitor units, can be a versatile alternative for shortening treatment time. The aim of the present study is to find the optimal single collimator in CyberKnife treatment planning to shorten the treatment time with the acceptable dose distribution. A spherical planning target volume PTV1 was drawn in an anthropomorphic head and neck phantom. Plans with same treatment goals were generated for all the 12 collimators independently. normalD95% was selected as the prescribing isodose and the prescribed dose was 10 Gy. The plan of the optimal collimator size was evaluated for conformity, homogeneity, and dose spillage outside the target. The optimum collimator size and the target dimensions were correlated. The study was repeated with two other target volumes PTV2 and PTV3 for generalizing the results. Collimator sizes just above the diameter of the spherical PTVs were yielding least number of nodes and beams with acceptable dose distributions. The collimator size of 35 mm is optimum for the PTV1, whose diameter is 31.4 mm. Similarly, 50 mm collimator is optimum for PTV2 (diameter=45.2 mm) and 20 mm collimator is optimum for PTV3 false(Diameter=17.3 mmfalse). The total number of monitor units is found to reduce with increasing collimator size. Optimal single collimator is found to be useful for shortening the treatment time in spherical targets. Studies on two clinical targets, (a brain metastasis and a liver metastasis cases) show comparable results with the phantom study.PACS numbers: 87.55.D, 87.55.de, 87.53.Ly, 87.55.kh, 87.56.nk, 87.55.ne, 87.55.‐x

Strategies to optimize stereotactic radiosurgery plans for brain tumors with volumetric‐modulated arc therapy

Wang

DeNittis

2020

Purpose Prescription practice in SRS plans for brain tumors differs significantly for different modalities. In this retrospective study, the strategies to optimize SRS plans for brain tumors with volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) were presented. Methods Fifty clinically treated cases were stratified by the maximum target size into two groups (≥ 2 cm in 25 cases and <2 cm but ≥1 cm in 25 cases), which were optimized using traditional LINAC MLC‐based approaches with the average prescription isodose line (P‐IDL) of (91.4 ± 0.6)%. Four to five plans have been created for each case with variation of the P‐IDL from 65% to 90%. The optimization strategies to select an optimal P‐IDL, to use tuning structures within the target and beyond as well as to use NTO (normal tissue objectives), were applied to all new plans. Results The optimal P‐IDL was found to be around 75%. After applying the new optimization strategies with an average P‐IDL of 74.8%, the mean modified gradient index (mGI) and V12 were reduced by 25% and 35%, respectively for both groups. The Paddick conformity index (PCI) was averagely improved by 8%. The average homogeneity index (HI) and focal index (FI) were increased by 22% and 50%, respectively. The mGI was inversely proportional to the PTV volumes. The shape of the dose distribution in target was also changed from concave to convex. The comparison of PCI with historical data from other institutes and modalities shows that the plans in this study have the best conformity near the target. Conclusions With the new optimization strategies for VMAT SRS plan of brain tumor more conformal plans in both high and intermediate dose region (~50% of the PD) were created, in which the dose in the core of the target was notably increased while V12 and mGI were significantly decreased, and PCI was improved. The mGI was inversely proportional to the PTV volumes. The optimal P‐IDL is around 75%. The average PCI is the best in this study compared with the published historical data. These strategies are applicable to treatment planning for multiple brain and liver tumors where sparing the tissue peripheral to the target is critical.