2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose-dependent efficacy of β-blocker in patients with chronic heart failure and atrial fibrillation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, a sub-study of the AF-CHF trial [39], including 1,376 HF patients, performed a propensity-matched analysis considering treatment or not with β-blockers and reported that during a median follow-up of 37 months there was an association between treatment with β-blockers and lower rates of all-cause mortality (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.94; p = 0.018), but not hospitalizations (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.71-1.10; p = 0.223), irrespective of the pattern or burden of AF. More recently, a sub-analysis of the MECKI score registry [40] on 958 HFrEF patients with AF described that, at 10-year follow-up, patients treated with β-blockers had better outcomes with no differences between β1-selective drugs (53%) and β1-β2-blockers (47%), and that survival improved in parallel with β-blocker dose increase.…”
Section: β-Blockers and Atrial Fibrillationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, a sub-study of the AF-CHF trial [39], including 1,376 HF patients, performed a propensity-matched analysis considering treatment or not with β-blockers and reported that during a median follow-up of 37 months there was an association between treatment with β-blockers and lower rates of all-cause mortality (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.94; p = 0.018), but not hospitalizations (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.71-1.10; p = 0.223), irrespective of the pattern or burden of AF. More recently, a sub-analysis of the MECKI score registry [40] on 958 HFrEF patients with AF described that, at 10-year follow-up, patients treated with β-blockers had better outcomes with no differences between β1-selective drugs (53%) and β1-β2-blockers (47%), and that survival improved in parallel with β-blocker dose increase.…”
Section: β-Blockers and Atrial Fibrillationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modified from Campodonico et al 42 that, at 10-year follow-up, patients treated with b-blockers had a better outcome with no effects as regards b1-selective drugs (53%) versus b1-b2 blockers (47%) and that survival improved in parallel with b-blocker dose increase (Figure 3). 43 New studies are still needed regarding the dangerous liaison between atrial fibrillation and heart failure: first, on the effects of sinus rhythm restoration on exercise performance, drugs, treatment and prognosis; similarly, different rate control strategies in atrial fibrillation heart failure patients.…”
Section: Atrial Fibrillationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of data derived from 958 heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation as part of the MECKI score database allowed to define that, at 10-year follow-up, patients treated with β-blockers had a better outcome with no effects as regards β1-selective drugs (53%) versus β1-β2 blockers (47%) and that survival improved in parallel with β-blocker dose increase (Figure 3). 43…”
Section: Atrial Fibrillationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 However, most heart failure patients included in clinical trials with β-blockers were in sinus rhythm, with only 11% to 35% of patients with atrial fibrillation, data on survival often being inconclusive. 30 A paper from the MECKI score database 31 pointed out that heart failure patients with permanent atrial fibrillation have a better outcome if treated with β-blockers. Moreover, the association between β-blockers and survival improvement was in parallel with daily β-blocker dose increase.…”
Section: β-Blockers and Heart Failure Prognosis In Special Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%