2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01070.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose‐dependent hypotension from epinephrine, or lidocaine, or both?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, we did not measure serum concentrations of articaine or catecholamines to investigate whether there was a relationship between these and cardiovascular response, as has been suggested in previous reports. 11 Third, we excluded patients who required administration of a vasopressor from further analysis. This resulted in the data from 3 patients not being included in recovery period after the hypotensive episode.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we did not measure serum concentrations of articaine or catecholamines to investigate whether there was a relationship between these and cardiovascular response, as has been suggested in previous reports. 11 Third, we excluded patients who required administration of a vasopressor from further analysis. This resulted in the data from 3 patients not being included in recovery period after the hypotensive episode.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We read with great interest the letter by Dr Enlund (1), in which he described an insightful analysis of the disparate results of two articles with regard to unintentional hypotension episodes after local infiltration of epinephrine‐containing lidocaine (2, 3). Dr Enlund successfully drew an integrative conclusion that a combination of relatively small doses of lidocaine and epinephrine results in profound hypotension, mainly due to an adrenergic β 2 effect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%