2019
DOI: 10.1002/jbio.201800484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose‐dependent study of effects of 532‐nm continuous wave laser on rat skin: A mechanistic insight

Abstract: Visible lasers emitting in the green spectral region are being routinely employed in various medical and defense fields namely treatment of pigmented lesions, tattoo inks, port wine stains, dazzling the target or mob dispersal. Despite their increasing applications, lasers also tend to pose occupational hazards to operators, ancillary personnel, individuals undergoing laser therapies. This study was aimed at investigating the effects of different doses of 532‐nm continuous wave laser on rat skin. The present s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, stronger excitation can produce visible cell damage if done carelessly. This can manifest immediately, e.g., as ablation , or bubbles, or in less immediate ways, such as changes in cell signaling, proliferation, , or cell blebbing . The protocol for measuring Raman-based single-cell profiles should therefore be determined by the biological hypothesis being tested by the experiment, the resilience of the cell types, and the consideration of what (if any) changes in the sample are acceptable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, stronger excitation can produce visible cell damage if done carelessly. This can manifest immediately, e.g., as ablation , or bubbles, or in less immediate ways, such as changes in cell signaling, proliferation, , or cell blebbing . The protocol for measuring Raman-based single-cell profiles should therefore be determined by the biological hypothesis being tested by the experiment, the resilience of the cell types, and the consideration of what (if any) changes in the sample are acceptable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%