2014
DOI: 10.4236/ijmpcero.2014.31011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose Distribution of Photon Beam by Siemens Linear Accelerator

Abstract: The radiation therapy is applied on around 50% of the cancer patients. As we know, before implementing a radiation treatment planning system in the clinic, the dose-calculation measurement must be validated using rigorous, clinically relevant criteria [1]. Percent Depth Doses (PDD), Dose Profile (DP), Open Collimator Factor (OCF) etc., are measured for all numbers of square fields for Treatment Planning System XiO, version 4.7, for 6 and 15 MV photons energies and for 15˚, 30˚, 45˚, 60˚ wedge, which were emplo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The INO OF shows an energy dependence in the high (LET) region of the Bragg peak for protons as well as between the 6 and 15 MV X-ray beams. The sensitivities measured for the fibre at 6 MV and 15 MV in dB/m/MU differs ( Figure 4 b), where 6 MV indicates a higher sensitivity based on MU delivered which is to be expected based on relative depths of dmax in clinical photon beams [ 31 ]. A reversal in the sensitivity comparison was observed after conversion from MU to dose in Gy (dB/m/Gy) ( Figure 4 b inset or Table 1 and Table 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The INO OF shows an energy dependence in the high (LET) region of the Bragg peak for protons as well as between the 6 and 15 MV X-ray beams. The sensitivities measured for the fibre at 6 MV and 15 MV in dB/m/MU differs ( Figure 4 b), where 6 MV indicates a higher sensitivity based on MU delivered which is to be expected based on relative depths of dmax in clinical photon beams [ 31 ]. A reversal in the sensitivity comparison was observed after conversion from MU to dose in Gy (dB/m/Gy) ( Figure 4 b inset or Table 1 and Table 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As we can see from Figure 2, this rate is not constant, it is an increasing function mostly, because this part of graf. In Figure 2, decrease asymptotically to the X-axis, which means the function itself never touch it or the dose value never arrive the value zero [6].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Determination of dosimetric characteristics of all radiation beams is important so that most appropriate set of treatment planning parameters is chosen. Dosimetry is vital element of treatment using radiation as all the treatment planning is based on data obtained during dosimetry [5]. To ensure that malignant part get the prescribed dose, it is essential to perform dose calculation by managing radiation beams which are characterized by various parameters in the treatment machine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%