2000
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.73.872.11026867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose equivalents of tumour repopulation during radiotherapy: the potential for confusion.

Abstract: When employing linear quadratic equations to calculate compensation for changes in overall treatment time, a potential confusion exists regarding use of the parameter commonly described as the dose equivalent of tumour repopulation. The more correct term for this factor is the biologically effective dose equivalent of tumour repopulation. The distinction between the two concepts is discussed and the potential errors arising from their confusion are illustrated by means of an example.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The animals were kept anesthetized (1.5% isoflurane, 30% O 2 ) during irradiation. The hypofractionated doses were determined by a calculation based on the linear quadratic formula for cell survival to calculate the “standard equivalent dose (SED)” for planning hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (34, 35). The fractions of 4.8 Gy × 10, 5.7 Gy × 8, 7 Gy × 6 and 9.3 Gy × 4 approximate the biological effect of a 70 Gy (35 fractions of 2 Gy each) dose plan for 9L and C6 tumors (36).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The animals were kept anesthetized (1.5% isoflurane, 30% O 2 ) during irradiation. The hypofractionated doses were determined by a calculation based on the linear quadratic formula for cell survival to calculate the “standard equivalent dose (SED)” for planning hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (34, 35). The fractions of 4.8 Gy × 10, 5.7 Gy × 8, 7 Gy × 6 and 9.3 Gy × 4 approximate the biological effect of a 70 Gy (35 fractions of 2 Gy each) dose plan for 9L and C6 tumors (36).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of the 9.3 Gy dose was determined by a calculation based on the linear quadratic formula for cell survival that calculates “standard equivalent dose (SED)” for planning hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (24, 25). The dose of 9.3 Gy × 4 fractions approximates the biological effect of a 70 Gy dose fractionation plan for F98 gliomas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas cell repopulation is usually ignored in the LQ model for conventional external beam radiotherapy or HF-SRS due to the relatively shorter radiation delivery time and a shorter interval between two consecutive deliveries compared to cell repair time, because of the considerably longer treatment interval between two Staged-SRS sessions, tumor cell survival would be undesirably increased due to cell repopulation. In order to reflect the potential decrease in tumor local control, a subtractive repopulation factor ( 17 , 21 ) was included in the calculation of BED to account for potential tumor proliferation during the intentional interval. Therefore, the total BED delivered to a tumor voxel of a complete Staged-SRS treatment course could be calculated as…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%