2018
DOI: 10.14309/00000434-201810001-00622
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose Escalation and Treatment Patterns of Advanced Therapies Used to Treat Ulcerative Colitis: A Retrospective Database Analysis in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study found that between 10-40% of patients, depending upon the specific biologic used, increased the dose and/or the frequency of administration during maintenance. This is generally consistent with studies in the US using administration claims data, which reported rates between 24-39% for ADA, IFX, and VEDO [17]. Rubin and colleagues 2017 reported slightly lower rates (13% and 29% for ADA and IFX, respectively) though they used a more restrictive definition; patients needed to have used double the daily dose for this to be considered an escalation [13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present study found that between 10-40% of patients, depending upon the specific biologic used, increased the dose and/or the frequency of administration during maintenance. This is generally consistent with studies in the US using administration claims data, which reported rates between 24-39% for ADA, IFX, and VEDO [17]. Rubin and colleagues 2017 reported slightly lower rates (13% and 29% for ADA and IFX, respectively) though they used a more restrictive definition; patients needed to have used double the daily dose for this to be considered an escalation [13].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Our study suggests that between 10-30% of patients use combination therapy, depending upon the specific biologic used (and, potentially, the line of therapy). This is slightly lower than rates reported from a recent US administrative claims database [17]. However, the data collection form encouraged physicians to consider any add-on of therapy to be a new line so if the IM was not administered concomitantly with the biologic therapy then the database would not consider this combination therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Finally, in both CD and UC subgroups, the option of prescribing combination treatment, was superficially found to be underrated, as only 3.6% of patients were under this treatment. Nevertheless, 13.57% of all patients under anti-TNFα treatment were receiving an immunosuppressant agent (Table 1), a figure falling in the range of real word recent data, which show a respective percentage of 10–30% in both USA and Europe [34,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%