1994
DOI: 10.1016/0899-7071(94)90151-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose optimization of nonionic contrast agent in dynamic computed tomography scanning of the abdomen and pelvis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bree et al [4] showed quantitatively that optimal hepatic enhancement could be produced by 125 mL of iohexol 350 injected at 2 mL/sec (total iodine = 43.7 g) despite the fact that the qualitative optimal hepatic enhancement was seen in those receiving 150 mL of iohexol 300 (total iodine = 45 g) at 2 mL /sec; however, both regimens increased hepatic enhancement by 50 H from baseline. Allen et al [19] reported results of a dose reduction study in which 45 patients were randomized to one of five groups receiving 100%, 75%, 60%, 50%, or 30% of 150 mL of ioversol 320. Diagnostic image quality in eight anatomic regions was assessed qualitatively, and quantitative analysis of density measurements in the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava was performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Bree et al [4] showed quantitatively that optimal hepatic enhancement could be produced by 125 mL of iohexol 350 injected at 2 mL/sec (total iodine = 43.7 g) despite the fact that the qualitative optimal hepatic enhancement was seen in those receiving 150 mL of iohexol 300 (total iodine = 45 g) at 2 mL /sec; however, both regimens increased hepatic enhancement by 50 H from baseline. Allen et al [19] reported results of a dose reduction study in which 45 patients were randomized to one of five groups receiving 100%, 75%, 60%, 50%, or 30% of 150 mL of ioversol 320. Diagnostic image quality in eight anatomic regions was assessed qualitatively, and quantitative analysis of density measurements in the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava was performed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%