2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06375-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose reduction and image quality improvement of chest radiography by using bone-suppression technique and low tube voltage: a phantom study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) that corresponds to the ratio of the differences between the mean pixel values of the signal and background, divided by the noise [ 31 ]. We estimated CNR using Equation (2) [ 32 ]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) that corresponds to the ratio of the differences between the mean pixel values of the signal and background, divided by the noise [ 31 ]. We estimated CNR using Equation (2) [ 32 ]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, until adjustment to the new digital environment is accomplished, there is potential for increasing radiation dose mainly due to the perceived lack of visual control [2]. Currently image processing techniques and noise reduction algorithms add to the traditional optimization strategies for optimal radiographic imaging [46,47]. As already mentioned earlier monitoring of patient doses (in terms of exposure indices or relevant dose quantityies such as the Kerma-Area Product KAP) assists in optimization of all X-ray examinations and also radiographic procedures.…”
Section: Digital Radiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, an image-processing technique called bone suppression (BS) processing has been developed and reported to be clinically useful [ [8] , [9] , [10] ]. BS attenuates the rib and clavicle signals in chest radiographs, and BS-processed images are similar to soft tissue images obtained using dual-energy subtraction [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%