2006
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2403050993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose Reduction in CT while Maintaining Diagnostic Confidence: Diagnostic Reference Levels at Routine Head, Chest, and Abdominal CT—IAEA-coordinated Research Project

Abstract: Comparison of CT results with diagnostic reference levels revealed the need for revisions, partly because the newer scanners have improved technology that facilitates lower patient doses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
67
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
67
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the HPS mode, the heart absorbed the highest doses among all thoracic organs, but the absorbed dose was only 10.0 mGy, which was less than that absorbed during a routine chest C T. 26 , 27 However, the absorbed organ doses were considerably higher for the other two acquisition modes, especially for the heart, which received approximately 200 mGy in the LPS mode. However, we did not use ECG modulation for LPS mode in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In the HPS mode, the heart absorbed the highest doses among all thoracic organs, but the absorbed dose was only 10.0 mGy, which was less than that absorbed during a routine chest C T. 26 , 27 However, the absorbed organ doses were considerably higher for the other two acquisition modes, especially for the heart, which received approximately 200 mGy in the LPS mode. However, we did not use ECG modulation for LPS mode in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Over the last decade, chest radiologists have considerably modified their CTprotocols and thus, reduced the radiation dose distributed from CT examinations with no loss in the diagnostic quality of examinations [1][2][3]. These changes started with the understanding that high-quality examinations, devoid of perceptible image noise, could be obtained at lower doses by selecting weight-adapted protocols and/or using automatic tube current modulation systems [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is renewed concern in the medical community and lay press about the long-term effects of increased radiation burden from diagnostic X-rays, particularly from CT exams of the head, chest, abdomen, and pelvis in young patients, which sometimes occur several times a year (24,25). In one study, an unenhanced two-sequence single-shot MR examination of the upper abdomen was superior to contrast-enhanced CT for detection of disease in six out of eight anatomical categories in the upper abdomen (26).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%