2011
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.10.6061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose Reduction to Anterior Surfaces With Organ-Based Tube-Current Modulation: Evaluation of Performance in a Phantom Study

Abstract: Organ-based tube-current modulation can reduce the dose to the anterior surface of patients without increasing image noise by commensurately increasing the dose to the posterior surface. This technique can reduce the dose to anterior radiosensitive organs for head and thoracic CT scans.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the phantom experiment of this study, the changes in radiation exposure with X-CARE use reduction at the midline of the precordial region and increase at the midline of the dorsal region are consistent with those of previous reports 2,3 . In the clinical cases, the use of X-CARE reduced the radiation dose ratios at the midline of the precordial region and the medial sides of both breasts by approximately 14 22 , which was less for the precordial region than in the phantom experiment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the phantom experiment of this study, the changes in radiation exposure with X-CARE use reduction at the midline of the precordial region and increase at the midline of the dorsal region are consistent with those of previous reports 2,3 . In the clinical cases, the use of X-CARE reduced the radiation dose ratios at the midline of the precordial region and the medial sides of both breasts by approximately 14 22 , which was less for the precordial region than in the phantom experiment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, this study still represents the largest database for pediatric organ dose estimates. Third, our study did not specifically address nuances associated with tube current modulation (30), bismuth shielding (31), or organ-based dose modulation (32), topics that we aim to adddress in future studies. Fourth, in a direct application of our coefficients to assess the organ doses for a real patient undergoing a CT examination, certain sources of error included the following: organ size and PEDIATRIC IMAGING: Organ Dose Estimation in Pediatric Chest and Abdominopelvic CT Tian et al patient size and the CTDI vol for pediatric chest and abdominopelvic CT examinations.…”
Section: Pediatric Imaging: Organ Dose Estimation In Pediatric Chestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mammary glands, thyroid glands, and eye lenses thus receive a lower dose as the system reduces the tube current when the tube comes close to these organs. To compensate for this reduction, the tube current in the X-ray projection from the opposite side is increased thus leaving mean image noise constant [51,52]. This application can be very useful in Clin Transl Imaging (2014) 2:557-569 565 SPECT/CT systems for sparing the lens in CT head acquisitions, as SPECT/CT can acquire only axial and not transaxial images with tilted gantry, because of problems in image registration.…”
Section: Organ-based and Automatic Kv Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%