2019
DOI: 10.1201/b21966
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose-Response Analysis Using R

Abstract: Dose-response analysis can be carried out using multi-purpose commercial statistical software, but except for a few special cases the analysis easily becomes cumbersome as relevant, non-standard output requires manual programming. The extension package drc for the statistical environment R provides a flexible and versatile infrastructure for doseresponse analyses in general. The present version of the package, reflecting extensions and modifications over the last decade, provides a user-friendly interface to s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
126
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The half maximal (50%) inhibitory concentration IC 50 of the selected compounds was calculated by measuring the activity as described before for at least ten data points in the concentration range of 0 μM to 200 μM of the inhibitory compound in at least triplicates. A four-parameter log-logistic dose-response curve was then globally fitted to the individual replicates using the R software collection [27] and the R package “drc” [28] as proposed by assessment of Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) [29, 30]. PPDK was incubated for 10 min with the inhibitors before each measurement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The half maximal (50%) inhibitory concentration IC 50 of the selected compounds was calculated by measuring the activity as described before for at least ten data points in the concentration range of 0 μM to 200 μM of the inhibitory compound in at least triplicates. A four-parameter log-logistic dose-response curve was then globally fitted to the individual replicates using the R software collection [27] and the R package “drc” [28] as proposed by assessment of Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) [29, 30]. PPDK was incubated for 10 min with the inhibitors before each measurement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liess et al, 2016) given that typically at least two parameters are F I G U R E 3 Guidelines for the selection of a null model for prediction of joint stressor effects on individuals (or populations, but see end of section 3 for caveats). SMOA, stressor mode of action (see glossary); CS, correlation of sensitivities; SE, stressoreffect relationship; ET, effect type; ES, effect size estimated (slope and intercept in a linear model or steepness and inflection point in the most parsimonious log-logistic model, which is sigmoidal; for details, see Ritz, Baty, Streibig, & Gerhard, 2016). Stressor sensitivity correlations for simple addition, dominance and multiplicative null model conceptualized under the perspective of sequential stressor action (cf.…”
Section: Issues Of Study De Sign and Cross-stud Y Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from 48-hpd readings were fitted to a 4-parameter log-logistic concentration-response model with the lower bound set to 0 using the R package drc (Ritz et al 2015). The response f occurring as a result of concentration x is modeled as in Equation 1, where c is the lower bound value (set to 0), d is the upper bound value, b determines slope steepness, and e is the concentration achieving 50% of maximum efficacy (EC50).…”
Section: Calculation Of Extract Potencymentioning
confidence: 99%