1986
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1986.sp015983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose‐response of acetylcholine receptor channels opened by a flash‐activated agonist in voltage‐clamped rat myoballs.

Abstract: SUMMARY1. Whole-cell or single-channel currents through acetylcholine (ACh) receptor channels were studied in voltage-clamped rat myoballs or in excised membrane patches from myoballs. The recording pipette contained CsC1 to suppress outward currents, and tetrodotoxin was used to help suppress Na+ currents.2. To minimize problems associated with bath applied agonists, myoballs were bathed in a solution containing the inactive (cis) isomer of the photo-isomerizable azobenzene derivative, Bis-Q. Calibrated light… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
48
1

Year Published

1986
1986
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1 A, for example, membrane properties of a myoball were monitored during pressure application of QBr. The increased conductance (roughly twice the resting conductance at -100 mV) was stable for at least 20 min after withdrawal of the pressure pipette, whereas with similar pressure application of reversibly bound agonists, the agonist-induced conductance persisted for only a few seconds after withdrawal, until the agonist diffused away (see also Chabala et al 1986). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…1 A, for example, membrane properties of a myoball were monitored during pressure application of QBr. The increased conductance (roughly twice the resting conductance at -100 mV) was stable for at least 20 min after withdrawal of the pressure pipette, whereas with similar pressure application of reversibly bound agonists, the agonist-induced conductance persisted for only a few seconds after withdrawal, until the agonist diffused away (see also Chabala et al 1986). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 B). These signals partially resemble light-flash relaxations with the reversibly bound agonist, Bis-Q, but there is an important difference (Chabala, Gurney & Lester, 1985;Chabala et al 1986). The Bis-Q is present in the bathing solution, so that within a few seconds after the flash, the newly isomerized molecules undergo diffusive exchange for fresh non-irradiated molecules.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations