2014
DOI: 10.1118/1.4893276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose response of selected solid state detectors in applied homogeneous transverse and longitudinal magnetic fields

Abstract: When transverse magnetic fields are present, great care must be taken when using diamond or diode detectors. Dose response varies with relative detector orientation, magnetic field strength, and between detectors. This response can be considerable (∼20% for both detectors). Both detectors in longitudinal fields exhibit little to no dose response as a function of magnetic field. Water tank simulations seem to suggest that the diode detector is better suited to general beam commissioning, and each detector must … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
67
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
67
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The longitudinal field dose response of the PR06C farmer chamber, 4 PTW60003 diamond detector, 5 and IBA PFD diode detector 5 is verified experimentally in this work, details on the physical properties of these three detectors can be found in Table I. Each detector was irradiated in air with a tight fit buildup cap to ensure electronic equilibrium; the buildup caps used are noted in Table I and were either a 1.3 cm PMMA F.…”
Section: B1 Longitudinal Field Verification Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The longitudinal field dose response of the PR06C farmer chamber, 4 PTW60003 diamond detector, 5 and IBA PFD diode detector 5 is verified experimentally in this work, details on the physical properties of these three detectors can be found in Table I. Each detector was irradiated in air with a tight fit buildup cap to ensure electronic equilibrium; the buildup caps used are noted in Table I and were either a 1.3 cm PMMA F.…”
Section: B1 Longitudinal Field Verification Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Each figure contains both the orientation III and IV measurements at low field longitudinal magnetic fields and previously published simulation data of these detectors in orientations III and IV. 4,5 The standard deviation in the simulation data sets was 0.25%, 0.7%, and 0.9% for the PR06C, PTW60003, and IBA PFD, respectively, while the estimated error in the measurements was ∼0.1%-∼0.2% for all three detectors. Both the measurements as well as the simulated ratio of the detectors' response with and without magnetic field applied during irradiation are close to 1.0.…”
Section: A Longitudinal Field Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the clinic, g should be applicable to nearly any application requiring high dose accuracy, such as beam modeling, 21 IMRT optimization, 42 dosimeter response modeling, 28,43 dose validation, 19 dose accumulation, 44 among others. As an example, due to the three-source nature of the MRIdian system, quasi-3D dosimeters, such as ArcCHECK (Sun Nuclear Corp., Melbourne, FL), are quite useful for dosimetry measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25][26][27][28] Its kernel (version 2006) is relatively compact including roughly 3000 lines of  code. The code is well-documented with extensive detail on the theory underlying all scattering processes, thus readily enabling its adaptation on a GPU, namely, our implementation g presented in this work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, there is great interest in developing new external-beam radiotherapy machines with integrated MRI [3][4][5][6][7]. However, since MRI requires magnetic (B) fields, the Lorentz force influences the trajectories of the secondary electrons, which in turn affects both the dose distribution in water [1,8,9] and the dose-response of ionization chambers [6,[10][11][12] and several other detectors [13,14]. Thus, dosimetry in the presence of a B-field requires understanding both the B-field effects on the dose distribution and the response of detectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%