A prospective cohort study investigating an exposure-response relationship among vibration-exposed male workers with numbness of the hands by Edlund M, Burström L, Gerhardsson L, Lundström R, Nilsson T, Sandén H, Hagberg M This study on hand-arm-vibration (HAV) exposed workers spanned 16 years; exposure dose was assessed for each individual; and the study may contribute to knowledge about an exposure-response relationship between neurological symptoms and HAV exposure. Furthermore, to our knowledge, there are no other studies reporting incidence of numbness in hands among HAV-exposed workers or how it affects work performance.
Affiliation
203Original article Scand J Work Environ Health. 2014;40(2):203-209. doi:10.5271/sjweh.3386 A prospective cohort study investigating an exposure-response relationship among vibration-exposed male workers with numbness of the hands Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the exposure-response relationship of hand-arm vibration (HAV) exposure to neurological symptoms (numbness) of the hand in a cohort of vibration-exposed workers.
MethodsThe baseline cohort comprised 241 office and manual workers with and without exposure to HAV.Numbness (the symptom or event) in the hand was assessed for all subjects at baseline and follow-ups after 5, 10, and 16 years. The workers were stratified into quartiles with no exposure in the first quartile and increasing intensity of exposure in quartiles 2-4 (groups 1-3). Data analysis was performed using survival analysis (time-to-event). Information on cumulative exposure and years of exposure to event was collected via questionnaires. Measurements were performed in accordance with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 5349-1.
ResultsThe hazard ratio (HR) of risk of event (numbness) differed statistically significantly between the nonexposed group (group 0) and the two higher exposure groups (groups 2 and 3). There was also a significant ratio difference between the lowest exposure group (group 1) and the two higher groups. The ratio for group 1 was 1.77 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.96-3.26] compared with 3.78 (95% CI 2.15-6.62) and 5.31 (95% CI 3.06-9.20) for groups 2 and 3, respectively.
ConclusionThe results suggest a dose-response relationship between vibration exposure and numbness of the hands. This underlines the importance of keeping vibration levels low to prevent neurological injury to the hands.