2023
DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02313-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dosimetric characteristics of 6MV flattening filter free and flattened beams among beam-matched linacs: a three-institutional study

Diana M. Ghemiș,
Loredana G. Marcu,
Vasile Virag
et al.

Abstract: Background Beam matching is a concept in radiotherapy applied to clinics where more than one linac is employed to harmonise beam characteristics across linacs for allowing patients interchange without replanning. In view of this, the current study analyzes and compares dosimetric characteristics of 6MV flattening filter free and flattened beams of three beam-matched linear accelerators (linacs) from three different clinics with the aim to evaluate the matching under tight criteria for gamma ana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This TPS beam model is availed by the vendor during acceptance testing. Specific beam profiles and percentage depth dose (PDD) measurements are undertaken at acceptance testing to verify the matching for broad square fields such as 10 × 10 cm 2 and 30 × 30 cm 2 [6]. For example, Elekta stipulates that for the purpose of matching, a photon beam requires the percentage depth dose at 10 cm (PDD 10 ) to be within ±1% for beam-matched LINACs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This TPS beam model is availed by the vendor during acceptance testing. Specific beam profiles and percentage depth dose (PDD) measurements are undertaken at acceptance testing to verify the matching for broad square fields such as 10 × 10 cm 2 and 30 × 30 cm 2 [6]. For example, Elekta stipulates that for the purpose of matching, a photon beam requires the percentage depth dose at 10 cm (PDD 10 ) to be within ±1% for beam-matched LINACs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Elekta stipulates that for beam profiles of 10 × 10 cm 2 and 30 × 30 cm 2 field sizes at a depth of 10 cm, the averaged point dose within the region covering 80% of the full width half maximum (FWHM) ought to be within a 2% difference in comparison to the same points from beam profiles of beam-matched LINACs [1]. A confirmation or agreement between dosimetric data is an assurance that a single beam model can be used for a cohort of LINACs from the same vendor [6] [7]. However, the beam-matching often defined by the vendor in most cases are not strict enough to guarantee optimal beam-match [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%