Dosimetric effects of jaw tracking in step‐and‐shoot intensity‐modulated radiation therapy

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to determine the dosimetric benefit to normal tissues by tracking the multi‐leaf collimator (MLC) apertures with the photon jaws in step‐and‐shoot intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) on the Varian 2100 platform. Radiation treatment plans for ten thoracic, three pediatric, and three head and neck cancer patients were converted to plans with the jaws tracking each segment's MLC apertures, and compared to the original plans in a commercial radiation treatment planning system (TPS). The change in normal tissue dose was evaluated in the new plan by using the parameters V5, V10, and V20 (volumes receiving 5, 10 and 20 Gy, respectively) in the cumulative dose‐volume histogram for the following structures: total lung minus gross target volume, heart, esophagus, spinal cord, liver, parotids, and brainstem. To validate the accuracy of our beam model, MLC transmission was measured and compared to that predicted by the TPS. The greatest changes between the original and new plans occurred at lower dose levels. In all patients, the reduction in V20 was never more than 6.3% and was typically less than 1%; the maximum reduction in V5 was 16.7% and was typically less than 3%. The variation in normal tissue dose reduction was not predictable, and we found no clear parameters that indicated which patients would benefit most from jaw tracking. Our TPS model of MLC transmission agreed with measurements with absolute transmission differences of less than 0.1% and, thus, uncertainties in the model did not contribute significantly to the uncertainty in the dose determination. We conclude that the amount of dose reduction achieved by collimating the jaws around each MLC aperture in step‐and‐shoot IMRT is probably not clinically significant.PACS numbers: 87.55.D‐ 87.55.de 87.55.dk

Detection of late radiation damage on left atrial fibrosis using cardiac late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging

“…Furthermore, Darby et al looked into risk of ischemic heart disease after breast radiation therapy and concluded that was an increasing magnitude of the risk of 7.4% per Gray with no apparent threshold below which there was no risk. Many of the previous studies evaluated RIHD using different imaging modalities to detect functional abnormalities, without correlation of the actual radiation treatment volume 41, 42, 43, 44, 45. Our results also show the same trend of higher radiation damage with increasing dose.…”

Potential reduction of lung dose via VMAT with jaw tracking in the treatment of single‐isocenter/two‐lesion lung SBRT

“…A few investigators have reported the dosimetric advantages of jaw tracking techniques for IMRT and VMAT planning . For instance, Joy et al .…”

“…Although the advantages of JT‐IMRT/VMAT plans with flattened beams have been studied previously, the dosimetric impact of JT technique with FFF beam in the treatment of lung SBRT patients, along with the treatment delivery complexity due to the use of JT with MLC motion has not yet been reported. The goals of this project were to quantify the dosimetric differences of JT technique for FFF beam in the SBRT treatment of multifocal lung lesions and to investigate the JT delivery complexity with MLC movements.…”

AAPM TG158: Measurement and calculation of doses outside the treated volume from external‐beam radiation therapy

“…To minimize nontarget dose, jaws and MLC leaves should be closed to the extent possible. For a tertiary MLC, Joy et al 314 considered tracking the MLC opening with the jaws for each segment of an IMRT delivery, thereby reducing leaf leakage. This approach reduced the V5 and V20 volumes of organs at risk near the edge of the treatment field by around 2% (absolute volume).…”