2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2012.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dosimetric feasibility of sparing the primary site for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma after transoral laser microsurgery in patients with unilateral positive neck nodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This confirmed similar data already published by different authors that demonstrated that an unintentional relevant dose at the tumor surgical bed was absorbed also in patients for whom the tumor surgical bed was not considered for irradiation. 3941 Results of the present study strongly support the recommendation to perform an accurate selection of patients eligible for TORS in order to achieve negative surgical margins and to always contour the tumor surgical bed as a separate volume in order to avoid an unnecessarily high radiation dose in that region.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This confirmed similar data already published by different authors that demonstrated that an unintentional relevant dose at the tumor surgical bed was absorbed also in patients for whom the tumor surgical bed was not considered for irradiation. 3941 Results of the present study strongly support the recommendation to perform an accurate selection of patients eligible for TORS in order to achieve negative surgical margins and to always contour the tumor surgical bed as a separate volume in order to avoid an unnecessarily high radiation dose in that region.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Fried et al first presented the concept of sparing the primary sites in their pilot study [ 6 ]. Possible dosimetric benefits were discussed for four patients treated with RT after transoral laser microsurgery for OPSCC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by recent studies to quantify the dose reduction to the OARs when excluding the primary tumor bed from the target volume, we adopted a comprehensive (Comp) method using the Auto-Planning (AP) technique to evaluate the potential dosimetric benefits of omitting the primary tumor bed from the target volume of the postoperative RT after TORS [ 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, while in theory eliminating the primary tumor bed as a target would theoretically lead to a substantial decrease in radiation to normal tissues, dosimetric studies comparing primary plus neck irradiation with neckonly irradiation suggest only a modest potential benefit with this approach [39,40]. This may be due to the fact that the level II lymph nodes, which represent the first echelon nodal drainage for oropharyngeal cancers, and are thus always in the neck radiation volume, sit adjacent to the tonsil and base of tongue.…”
Section: Omitting Adjuvant Radiation To the Primary Tumor Bedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was however a slight benefit in dose to the oral cavity (34.0 Gy vs. 29.8 Gy p = 0.002) and superior pharyngeal constrictors (46.1 Gy vs. 42.9 Gy p = 0.01). A separate study of base of tongue tumors compared radiation plans of patients receiving adjuvant radiation to the bilateral neck and primary tumor to those same patients replanned to receive only bilateral neck radiation and found a decrease in oral cavity dose (47.4 Gy vs. 22.3 Gy) but no significant benefit for contralateral parotid or pharyngeal constrictor muscles [40]. Of note, the primary tumor bed still received a mean dose of 40.2 Gy, which could complicate consideration of future re-irradiation for any patients who may recur.…”
Section: Omitting Adjuvant Radiation To the Primary Tumor Bedmentioning
confidence: 99%