2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dosimetric Impact of Interfraction Catheter Movement in High-Dose Rate Prostate Brachytherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A variety of methods have been used to estimate interfraction motion in prostate HDR [16,54] and the subsequent impact on rectum dose parameters for prostate brachytherapy [54,[63][64][65]. Simnor et at.…”
Section: Inter-fraction Motion Should Be Consideredmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of methods have been used to estimate interfraction motion in prostate HDR [16,54] and the subsequent impact on rectum dose parameters for prostate brachytherapy [54,[63][64][65]. Simnor et at.…”
Section: Inter-fraction Motion Should Be Consideredmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, HDR BT is often delivered via multiple fractions per implant (13). Between fractions the catheters can shift relative to the prostate (14e21) resulting in uncertainty in the delivered dose (22,23). Using intraoperative ultrasound (US) images to identify the catheters and determine the dose distribution for each fraction allows the patient to remain in the same position for catheter implantation, imaging, and treatment (24,25), increasing the accuracy with which dose can be delivered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could produce the spatial dose distribution that conform to the speci c shape of the target and minimize the doses to OARs, but also lead to extremely high dose regions. A few investigators have noticed that this had the potential risk of inducing toxicity if there is a displacement of the catheters [36][37][38]. The displacement of a large dwell time apparently has a greater effect on the treatment plan than if dwell time differences were not so signi cant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%