based his taxonomy of dramatic situations, or plot devices, on some twelve hundred examples from ancient and modern literature, including the "principal dramas of China, of India, of Judea, and needless to say, of the Greek theater." He hoped that his archetypes would function as diagnostic tools. Which plots are the "most neglected and which the most used, in each epoch, genre, school, author?" he asked, and "What are the reasons for these preferences"? 2 His book concluded not only with a defense of imagination but also with an offer to generate "ten thousand scenarios totally different from those used repeatedly upon our stage in the last fifty years." "I will deliver a thousand in eight days," he wrote: "Prices are quoted on single dozens. Write or call, No. 19, Passage de l'Elysee des Beaux-Arts." 3 Polti's views were as popular as they were controversial. For a scholar of literary history, the Thirty-Six Dramatic Situations prefigures later structural studies of narrative by, among others, Vladimir Propp and Claude Levi-Strauss. Its first English-language review appeared in the Nation in 1895. The Editor began advertising a translation by Lucille Ray in 1915. One could find it for sale in the back pages of literary periodicals well into the 1960s,