1975
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.11.1378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double beta decay ofTe128

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
1
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
14
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The upper limits for m~ and r/ (ignoring neutrino mixing) are m~ < 5 eV and r/< 2 x 10-5, independently of the specifics of the calculation, aside from the assumed equality of the matrix elements. The ratio of Kirsten et al, however, disagrees with another geochemical ratio, obtained by Hennecke et al (83), ~r13o/~r~2s = (6.3+0.2) -4. This t 1/2/-t 1/2 result could be interpreted as requiring 0v decay to occur and thus would constitute evidence for lepton-number violation with either m~ ~ 10 eV or /m 5 x 10-5.…”
Section: For(co) M2 F~(eo) + Mrlfm~(eo) + Rl 2fn(eo)contrasting
confidence: 50%
“…The upper limits for m~ and r/ (ignoring neutrino mixing) are m~ < 5 eV and r/< 2 x 10-5, independently of the specifics of the calculation, aside from the assumed equality of the matrix elements. The ratio of Kirsten et al, however, disagrees with another geochemical ratio, obtained by Hennecke et al (83), ~r13o/~r~2s = (6.3+0.2) -4. This t 1/2/-t 1/2 result could be interpreted as requiring 0v decay to occur and thus would constitute evidence for lepton-number violation with either m~ ~ 10 eV or /m 5 x 10-5.…”
Section: For(co) M2 F~(eo) + Mrlfm~(eo) + Rl 2fn(eo)contrasting
confidence: 50%
“…The 130 Te DBDHL calculated from analyses of kitkaite (NiTeSe) [15] falls right in the middle of "short" DBDHL values, lending strong support to the cluster of "short" DBDHL of 130 Te as the correct value. We therefore propose that the 130 Te DBDHL should be 9.0 ± 1.4 × 10 20 yr (as the weighted average of [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]) and 128 Te DBDHL should be 2.41 ± 0.39 × 10 24 yr (corresponding to the observed ratio of 128 Te-derived 128 Xe to 130 Te-derived 130 Xe of 3.74 ± 0.10 × 10 −4 [32]). …”
Section: Best Current Estimate For 130 Te and 128 Te Dbdhlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first measurement of the 130 Te DBDHL was made 58 years ago by Ingram and Reynolds [1]. Since then, numerous determinations, performed in different laboratories using tellurium min- erals of different ages, have yielded 130 Te DBDHLs that tend to fall into two distinct groups, 2.5 ± 0.4 × 10 21 yr [2-10] and 8 ± 1 × 10 20 yr [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], which clearly differ substantially more than the experimental uncertainties ( Fig. 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tellür izotoplarının beta bozunumuna olan yatkınlığı nedeniyle, bir çok kez bu izotopların çift-beta bozunum analizi yapılmıştır [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Diğer bir uygulama alanı ise ağır element nükleosentezindeki hızlı ve yavaş nötron yakalama süreçleridir.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified