1977
DOI: 10.3109/17453677708994810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double Blind Evaluation of Extradural Methyl Prednisolone for Herniated Lumbar Discs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
69
0
6

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
69
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…152,153,158,171,173 However, there was no statistically significant difference between intervention groups for the global effect. 148,152,153,165,173,176 Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference between epidural injection and inactive control for global effect, 152 Epidural vs activity restriction 1 (1) 40 ( (62) 2/29 (7) 1/29 (3) 1/29 (3) 13/29 (45) 2/29 (7) This ). There were no statistically significant difference between epidural injection and usual care at medium-term follow-up for global effect, 151,174 pain intensity 151,174 or CSOMs.…”
Section: Summary Of Overall Findings For Epidural/intradiscal Injectimentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…152,153,158,171,173 However, there was no statistically significant difference between intervention groups for the global effect. 148,152,153,165,173,176 Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference between epidural injection and inactive control for global effect, 152 Epidural vs activity restriction 1 (1) 40 ( (62) 2/29 (7) 1/29 (3) 1/29 (3) 13/29 (45) 2/29 (7) This ). There were no statistically significant difference between epidural injection and usual care at medium-term follow-up for global effect, 151,174 pain intensity 151,174 or CSOMs.…”
Section: Summary Of Overall Findings For Epidural/intradiscal Injectimentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The duration of follow-up ranged from 24 hours 148 to 6 weeks. 173 Six RCTs 148,152,153,165,173,176 compared epidural injections with inactive control; the overall findings were found to be in favour of epidural, but were not statistically significant. Three RCTs 152,153,173 were good quality.…”
Section: Summary Of Study Participants For Epidural/intradiscal Injecmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Numerous authors have reported on their value in treating patients with radicular pain with the possibility of delaying or even obviating the need for lumbar discectomy in well-selected patients. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] There are two well-performed clinical studies in the peer reviewed literature that examined the crossover rates to surgery for patients who received either ESI or SNRB. In a prospective study, Buttermann et al found a crossover rate to surgery for patients with symptomatic disc herniations treated with ESI of 54% (27/50).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of epidural steroids in the treatment of symptoms of lumbar nerve root compression remains controversial [1,2,6,7,9,[12][13][14][15][16]. One reason for different results and ineffectiveness may be the fact that the steroids to not reach the appropriate nerve root in a sufficient concentration by conventional caudal or posterior injection techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%