1991
DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1991.tb05625.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled, Cross‐Over Trial of Progabide as Add‐On Therapy in Epileptic Patients

Abstract: In a double-blind, cross-over trial, progabide (PGB) and placebo were compared as add-on therapy in 59 patients with moderate to severe epilepsy. Eight patients did not complete the study, 4 because of adverse drug reactions (elevation of liver transaminases, 2; gastritis, 1; and acute psychosis, 1) and 4 because of administrative reasons. Among the remaining 51 patients, seizure frequency was reduced greater than 50% in 18 patients with PGB treatment and in 8 patients with placebo (p less than 0.05). The numb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…b If ED 50-100 is presented as a range of values, the average value is used for ratio calculations. c Average calculated from Martinez et al, 12 de Pasquet et al 13 and Loiseau et al 14 d Obtained from Treiman et al 15 e Obtained from Rentmeester et al 16 f Average calculated from Faught et al 17 and Sperling et al 18 g Obtained from French et al 19…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…b If ED 50-100 is presented as a range of values, the average value is used for ratio calculations. c Average calculated from Martinez et al, 12 de Pasquet et al 13 and Loiseau et al 14 d Obtained from Treiman et al 15 e Obtained from Rentmeester et al 16 f Average calculated from Faught et al 17 and Sperling et al 18 g Obtained from French et al 19…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the POP trials, efficacious doses were defined as dose levels in which 50-100% of patients had a positive response (ED 50-100 ), where a response was considered to be either a complete abolishment or a significant partial decrease in sensitivity to standard visual frequencies. No attempt was made to distinguish between these two types of positive responses since small numbers of patients (majority of trials had 4-6 patients per dose level, range [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] were typically tested at each dose level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%