1994
DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)90225-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double-blind randomized study of lonidamine and radiotherapy in head and neck cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At least 14 phase II studies with lonidamine either as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy and radiation have been reported in breast, lung, ovarian, and head and neck cancer. The heterogeneity and uncontrolled design of these studies can only suggest the efficacy of lonidamine [ 36 49 ] ( Table 2 ). These data led to testing lonidamine in 5 phase III trials in breast [ 50 – 54 ] and 5 trials in lung cancer [ 55 – 59 ].…”
Section: Lonidaminementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least 14 phase II studies with lonidamine either as a single agent or in combination with chemotherapy and radiation have been reported in breast, lung, ovarian, and head and neck cancer. The heterogeneity and uncontrolled design of these studies can only suggest the efficacy of lonidamine [ 36 49 ] ( Table 2 ). These data led to testing lonidamine in 5 phase III trials in breast [ 50 – 54 ] and 5 trials in lung cancer [ 55 – 59 ].…”
Section: Lonidaminementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two clinical trials originating in Italy in the early 1990s evaluated the role of metabolic targeting in HNSCC and suggested that the addition of lonidamine to either external beam radiation or chemotherapy (methotrexate) improved clinical outcomes 72, 73. In the setting of a phase III double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial of 97 patients with stage II–IV disease, the addition of lonidamine resulted in a lower treatment‐failure rate (50% vs 77% for placebo), improved locoregional control (63% vs 37% at 5 years), and disease‐free survival (40% vs 19%) 73. With these exceptions, metabolic targeting in HNSCC has been primarily limited to a small number of preclinical studies and focused on 2‐DG.…”
Section: Implications Of Altered Metabolism For Hnscc Response To Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the late 1980s, lonidamine (LND, also known as AF1890), a reversible inhibitor of spermatogenesis [ 72 ], was widely employed in clinical trials for cancer therapy in combination with several anticancer drugs and/or radiation (for a review, see [ 73 ]). LND is characterized by relatively mild side effects that do not overlap with those related to conventional cytostatic therapies [ 74 ]. Its toxicity does not involve bone marrow, but myalgia appears as the most relevant and common side effect [ 74 ], likely related to the proton-linked Monocarboxylate Transporter (MCT) inhibition and consequent lactate accumulation in myocytes.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LND is characterized by relatively mild side effects that do not overlap with those related to conventional cytostatic therapies [ 74 ]. Its toxicity does not involve bone marrow, but myalgia appears as the most relevant and common side effect [ 74 ], likely related to the proton-linked Monocarboxylate Transporter (MCT) inhibition and consequent lactate accumulation in myocytes. In male patients, reversible azoospermia should be taken into account.…”
Section: Main Textmentioning
confidence: 99%