2011
DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2011.0118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double Cut and Join with Insertions and Deletions

Abstract: Many approaches to compute the genomic distance are still limited to genomes with the same content, without duplicated markers. However, differences in the gene content are frequently observed and can reflect important evolutionary aspects. While duplicated markers can hardly be handled by exact models, when duplicated markers are not allowed, a few polynomial time algorithms that include genome rearrangements, insertions and deletions were already proposed. In an attempt to improve these results, in the prese… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
217
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(218 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
217
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, analysis of non-orientable surfaces (such as Klein bottle) seems to be relevant to the double distance problem asking for a maximal cycle decomposition of the contracted breakpoint graph of a given all-duplicated genome and an ordinary genome. Also, embedded graphs on surfaces with boundaries (holes) can be related to models including genome rearrangements along with gene insertions and deletions [29, 30]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, analysis of non-orientable surfaces (such as Klein bottle) seems to be relevant to the double distance problem asking for a maximal cycle decomposition of the contracted breakpoint graph of a given all-duplicated genome and an ordinary genome. Also, embedded graphs on surfaces with boundaries (holes) can be related to models including genome rearrangements along with gene insertions and deletions [29, 30]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DCJ-indel distance between A and B is the minimum number of DCJs and indels required to transform A into B , and it is denoted as d DCJ ind( A,B ). This distance can also be found in polynomial time, using two different approaches (Compeau [20] and Braga et al [21]). Here, we use Compeau’s approach, which is based creating prosthetic chromosomes [22] in each genome, formed by the unique genes of the other, creating two new genomes with the same gene content.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We analyze genomes with unequal content, but without duplicated markers and extend the results given in [6] to develop a linear time algorithm that exactly computes the genomic distance with substitutions and DCJ operations. The objective of this model is to provide a parsimonious genomic distance to handle genomes free of duplicated markers, that in practice is a lower bound to the real genomic distances.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Insertions and deletions can be shortly called indels . In [4], the operations allowed are inversions and indels, while the models given in [5] and [6] consider indels and the double cut and join (DCJ) operation [7], that is able to represent most large scale mutation events in genomes, such as inversions, translocations, fusions and fissions. The mentioned approaches assign the same weight to all rearrangement operations, including indels, regardless of the size of the affected regions and the particular types of the operations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation