1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(97)00096-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double Data Entry: What Value, What Price?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to ensure the reliability of data and identify nonconformities, the study used a dual independent typing of all questionnaires 36 . In case of disagreement, a third researcher checked the original document (which was kept secret) to ascertain the correct completion of the response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to ensure the reliability of data and identify nonconformities, the study used a dual independent typing of all questionnaires 36 . In case of disagreement, a third researcher checked the original document (which was kept secret) to ascertain the correct completion of the response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Büchele et al (9) report a single data entry error proportion of between 0.% and .1%, depending on whether the variable was plain text, open continuous or closed dichotomous. Both Büchele et al and Day et al (30) discuss the viability of reducing the error rates by using a double-entry system, which does however increase the cost of the study by a factor of about .5. As already indicated, the MCBR uses a modified singleentry format.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only 21 errors were found (error rate: 4.49 per 10,000), acceptable by the established standard of 10 per 10,000 fields for paper-based parallel data entry [24,25]. Error rates for PAPI methods were significantly higher (t = 11.58, p < 0.0001), with 215 errors in 44 questionnaires and over 7000 entry fields (error rate: 307 per 10,000), suggesting that the transition from PAPI to CAPI led to a reduction in error rate by a factor of nearly 70.…”
Section: Data Collection Qualitymentioning
confidence: 83%