2005
DOI: 10.1134/1.1858552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double-differential cross sections for the production of neutrons from Pb, W, Zr, Cu, and Al targets irradiated with 0.8-, 1.0-, and 1.6-GeV protons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evaluation of the modeling of the secondary-proton spectra is unreliable because of the lack of complete experimental information. As noted in [4,8], the agreement between the computational and experimental results is good for the neutron spectra calculated with the LAHET program. Consequently, the computed reaction rates calculated with the normalized excitation functions and the computed neutron and proton spectra on the surface of and inside the target were used to determine the corresponding computed spectrum-averaged cross section for the reactions (n, xn), (n, α), (n, p), and (p, xn):…”
Section: Irradiation Of a Lead Target And Determination Of The Numbersupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The evaluation of the modeling of the secondary-proton spectra is unreliable because of the lack of complete experimental information. As noted in [4,8], the agreement between the computational and experimental results is good for the neutron spectra calculated with the LAHET program. Consequently, the computed reaction rates calculated with the normalized excitation functions and the computed neutron and proton spectra on the surface of and inside the target were used to determine the corresponding computed spectrum-averaged cross section for the reactions (n, xn), (n, α), (n, p), and (p, xn):…”
Section: Irradiation Of a Lead Target And Determination Of The Numbersupporting
confidence: 50%
“…3) the production cross section of product nuclei in thin lead targets, both enriched with [206][207][208] Pb and with the naturally occurring composition, as well as 209 Bi for proton energy 0.04, 0.07, 0.1, 0.15, 0.25, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, and 2.6 GeV [6,7]; and 4) the double-differential cross sections for neutron generation under irradiation of Pb, W, Zr, Cu, Al, and Na thin targets by 0.8, 1, and 1.6 GeV protons, using a time-of-flight spectrometer [4,8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is well known that the spectra of secondary spallation neutrons and heavy extended targets are close to evaporative spectra, whose average energy is ~3 MeV. Only ~10% of such neutrons have energy about 14.5 MeV, the fraction of cascade neutrons with energy above ~0.1 GeV, initiating fission of 232 Th and 238 U, is even lower [11]. Thus, many low-energy neutrons but few cascade neutrons, giving rise to fission of 232 Th and 238 U, are present in the system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Many computational-theoretical investigations and numerous experiments studying neutron generation and energy production in heavy targets in proton beams are now being conducted. Examples are [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such spectrometers handle the conditions of "good" geometry and allow high resolution mea surements over a very wide range of energies from a few hundred keV up to a few GeV. The time of flight spectrometers at LANL [19,20], JINR [21,22], KEK [23], Saclay [24] and ITEP [25,26] are examples of such detectors. The drawbacks of this method are: (1) a strong neu tron energy dependence of the energy resolution which is impaired with energy, (2) the need for time tag to the neutron production event, (3) necessity of fulfilling the "good" geometry condition, and (4) obligatory long range distance, a path length, from the neutron source, which sharply decreases the solid angle of neutron detection, deteriorates the background condition and increases the measurement time.…”
Section: Methods Of High Energymentioning
confidence: 99%