2016
DOI: 10.1109/ted.2016.2616035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double-Gate Negative-Capacitance MOSFET With PZT Gate-Stack on Ultra Thin Body SOI: An Experimentally Calibrated Simulation Study of Device Performance

Abstract: In this work, we propose and investigate the high performance and low power design space of non-hysteretic negative capacitance MOSFETs for the 14 nm node based on the calibrated simulations using an experimental gate stack with PZT ferroelectric to obtain negative capacitance effect. All necessary parameters are extracted by carefully characterizing experimentally fabricated ferroelectric capacitors, to ensure realistic simulation results. The ferroelectric thickness obtained by the proposed approach leads to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
48
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A negative capacitor in the gate stack can make the total capacitance larger than its classical value, which leads to the decrease of the required ∆V g to provide the same ∆ψ s . The challenges of ferroelectrics NC integration with conventional transistors are related to achieving simultaneously a matched design of the ferroelectric and in-series stabilizing MOS capacitors [5], [6]. In this context, a significant boosting can occur while the device behavior is still Ali non-hysteretic [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A negative capacitor in the gate stack can make the total capacitance larger than its classical value, which leads to the decrease of the required ∆V g to provide the same ∆ψ s . The challenges of ferroelectrics NC integration with conventional transistors are related to achieving simultaneously a matched design of the ferroelectric and in-series stabilizing MOS capacitors [5], [6]. In this context, a significant boosting can occur while the device behavior is still Ali non-hysteretic [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The challenges of ferroelectrics NC integration with conventional transistors are related to achieving simultaneously a matched design of the ferroelectric and in-series stabilizing MOS capacitors [5], [6]. In this context, a significant boosting can occur while the device behavior is still Ali non-hysteretic [6]. This paper experimentally investigates the impact of the NC on DC electrical characteristics of Tunnel FETs (TFETs) and MOSFETs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The challenges of using BTBT together with the NC in a single device are related to the matched design of the capacitances (ferroelectric and in-series stabilizing MOS capacitance) in a regime of operation, where a significant boosting of TFET electrical performance can be achieved [5,17,14]. In order to have a non-hysteretic NC switch, the total capacitance of the gate needs to be positive in the whole range of the operation [16]. Accordingly, the matching condition of the NC-TFET to have a sufficient amplification in the nonhysteretic operation of the device can express as it follows [14,18,5,17,19]:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The underlying idea consists of exploiting the negative capacitance region of ferroelectric materials, defined as C F E = dQ/dV F E , where Q and V F E refer to the charge density and the voltage drop over the ferroelectric, respectively [9], [10]. A ferroelectric capacitor (FE) in series with a dielectric capacitor (DE) of a proper value can be biased in the negative capacitance region, providing a larger capacitance than the constituent DE capacitor [11]. In order to have a non-hysteretic NCFET, the ferroelectric NC and DE capacitor should be well matched to provide a positive total capacitance in the whole range of the operation [12], [13] while the slope of the charge line is smaller than the negative slope of the FE polarization [14], [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%