1994
DOI: 10.1016/0363-5023(94)90088-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double incision open technique for carpal tunnel release: An alternative to endoscopic release

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
59
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A 1-cm volar incision is made through which visualization and identification of structures can be made and the release undertaken [16,21,34,41]. This method has delivered very promising results with complications at a rate of 4.7 %, but of which there were no nerve injuries and no long-term sequelae [9,16,21,22,34,40,42]. However, no publications from 1966 through 2006, reviewing outcome of "open minimal incision" type of CTR meeting our study inclusion criteria, were found (2006 Rab et al study with bilateral CTR randomized to open on one side and two portal endoscopic on the other side which did not meet inclusive criteria of this metaanalysis, because there were only 10 patients and parameter data was in non-standard units, but essentially reaffirmed its conclusions) [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 1-cm volar incision is made through which visualization and identification of structures can be made and the release undertaken [16,21,34,41]. This method has delivered very promising results with complications at a rate of 4.7 %, but of which there were no nerve injuries and no long-term sequelae [9,16,21,22,34,40,42]. However, no publications from 1966 through 2006, reviewing outcome of "open minimal incision" type of CTR meeting our study inclusion criteria, were found (2006 Rab et al study with bilateral CTR randomized to open on one side and two portal endoscopic on the other side which did not meet inclusive criteria of this metaanalysis, because there were only 10 patients and parameter data was in non-standard units, but essentially reaffirmed its conclusions) [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 Light touch, if impaired, usually returns within the first 3 months after surgery. 95 Pain that occurs following CTR is usually due to the surgical incision and pillar pain or tenderness. 51 Pillar pain occurs at the bony pillars of attachment for the transverse carpal ligament (the hook of the hamate, pisiform, scaphoid tubercle, and the ridge of the trapezium).…”
Section: Consequences Of Ctr: What To Expect Following Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,12,13,17) The primary goal of limited skin incisions is to achieve better cosmetic results, lesser scar formation and decreased postoperative pain on the surface of palm. 2,8,9,12,13,16,17) As many as 24% of postoperative problems are related to skin incision. 1) Hypertrophic and/or sensitive scar formation, and tenderness are the most common sequelae.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,8,9,13,16,17) The standard skin incision for carpal tunnel surgery runs from the wrist flexion crease, and extends curvilinearly to a point in line with the distal border of the fully extended thumb. 11) In this technique, the incision is generally placed 2 to 3 mm medial to the volar crease, in line with the long axis of the ring finger.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%