Double jeopardy from the COVID-19 pandemic: risk of exposure and income loss in Portugal

Abstract

Background Increasing evidence indicates that the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic had immediate health and social impact, disproportionately affecting certain socioeconomic groups. Assessing inequalities in risk of exposure and in adversities faced during the pandemic is critical to inform targeted actions that effectively prevent disproportionate spread and reduce social and health inequities. This study examines i) the socioeconomic and mental health characteristics of individuals working in the workplace, thus at increased risk of COVID-19 exposure, and ii) individual income losses resulting from the pandemic across socioeconomic subgroups of a working population, during the first confinement in Portugal. Methods This study uses data from ‘COVID-19 Barometer: Social Opinion’, a community-based online survey in Portugal. The sample for analysis comprised n = 129,078 workers. Logistic regressions were performed to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (AOR) of factors associated with working in the workplace during the confinement period and with having lost income due to the pandemic. Results Over a third of the participants reported working in the workplace during the first confinement. This was more likely among those with lower income [AOR = 2.93 (2.64-3.25)], lower education [AOR = 3.17 (3.04-3.30)] and working as employee [AOR = 1.09 (1.04-1.15)]. Working in the workplace was positively associated with frequent feelings of agitation, anxiety or sadness [AOR = 1.14 (1.09-1.20)] and perception of high risk of infection [AOR = 11.06 (10.53-11.61)]. About 43% of the respondents reported having lost income due to the pandemic. The economic consequences affected greatly the groups at increased risk of COVID-19 exposure, namely those with lower education [AOR = 1.36 (1.19-1.56)] and lower income [AOR = 3.13 (2.47-3.96)]. Conclusions The social gradient in risk of exposure and in economic impact of the pandemic can result in an accumulated vulnerability for socioeconomic deprived populations. The COVID-19 pandemic seems to have a double effect in these groups, contributing to heightened disparities and poor health outcomes, including in mental health. Protecting the most vulnerable populations is key to prevent the spread of the disease and mitigate the deepening of social and health disparities. Action is needed to develop policies and more extensive measures for reducing disproportionate experiences of adversity from the COVID-19 pandemic among most vulnerable populations.

Moderation of the association between COVID-19-related income loss and depression by receipt of financial support: Repeated cross-sectional surveys of young adults in Canada and France (2020–2021)

“…All sociodemographic characteristics were considered as potential confounders in our analysis because: a) they are empirically demonstrated explanatory factors (social determinants) associated with depression ( Alegría et al, 2022 ; Jenkins et al, 2021 ; McQuaid et al, 2021 ; Silva et al, 2016 ), and b) are empirically or conceptually related to our exposure variable of income loss ( de Miquel et al, 2022 ; Gama et al, 2021 ).…”

COVID-19 and relationship quality: Emotional, paid work and organizational spheres

“…The COVID-19 outbreak has been accompanied by unprecedented disruptions to global economies, which has, in turn, led to income losses and high unemployment rates (Dang and Viet Nguyen, 2021). Individuals who experience income or job loss, or reduced working hours, are more likely to experience a decrease in relationship quality (e.g., Blom et al, 2020;Brand, 2015;Kinnunen and Pulkkinen, 1998); see arrow D. A job loss is one of the worst financial shocks a family can face, making it extremely difficult for them to make ends meet, and to avoid distressing downstream effects, such as a foreclosure or an eviction (Gama et al, 2021). In addition, the pandemic has brought with it an enormous increase in economic uncertainty, fueling negative future expectations for all workers, regardless of whether they lost their jobs (Guetto et al, 2021).…”

Trade-offs during the COVID-19 pandemic: A discrete choice experiment about policy preferences in Portugal

“…With the consecutive lockdowns, the economy slowed down considerably (GDP in 2020 decreased by 8.4%). This led to a considerable loss of household income for many people, either because they owned a business that was affected or because they were laid off [21][22][23]. The second attribute was the percentage decrease in the respondent's household income related with the pandemic.…”