2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.crmeth.2021.100008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double-jeopardy: scRNA-seq doublet/multiplet detection using multi-omic profiling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Doublet identification and removal was performed using both DoubletFinder 67 and MLtiplet 68 . Each cell type was subsetted into individual objects, and re-clustering within these objects was performed excluding genes which were likely to be influenced by experimental rather than biological factors 69 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Doublet identification and removal was performed using both DoubletFinder 67 and MLtiplet 68 . Each cell type was subsetted into individual objects, and re-clustering within these objects was performed excluding genes which were likely to be influenced by experimental rather than biological factors 69 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These clusters were then annotated broadly into B cell, T cell or myeloid clusters based on mapping of >10% BCR+ droplets and elevated CD19 expression, >10% TCR+ droplets and elevated CD3 expression, <10% BCR/TCR+ droplets, respectively. Doublet identification and removal was performed using both DoubletFinder 67 and MLtiplet 68 . Each cell type was subsetted into individual objects, and re-clustering within these objects was performed excluding genes which were likely to be influenced by experimental rather than biological factors 69 .…”
Section: Filtering Doublet Detection and Batch Correction Of The Panc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining 5% of nuclei (randomly distributed across the males) had alleles from both lineages, a result that most likely arose because of cross-contamination between different samples. A certain degree of such contamination is expected because it is challenging to accurately sort and genotype individual nuclei ( 12 , 13 ). To corroborate these results, we used whole-genome sequencing to identify R- and W-specific sequences and carried out in situ hybridization using probes targeting these sequences on male tissue sections.…”
Section: Males Are Chimeras Of Haploid Cells From the Two Divergent L...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hashtag negatives or doublets, as well as cells with low (<500) unique molecular identifiers (UMIs), were removed. Cells with <100 genes and >50% mitochondrial content were removed to filter low-quality, dead, or dying populations, with a second pass filter excluding apoptotic populations characterized by a low percentage of ribosomal genes versus a high percentage of mitochondrial genes, using a defined mitochondrial-ribosomal RNA ratio of >0.47 26 . Downstream transcriptome-based graph clustering and principal component analyses (PCA) with cell phenotype consensus calling were performed using R Seurat v4.1.1 package 9 , without input of TCR, BCR, mitochondrial, ribosomal, or sex-linked genes to avoid bias due to known expression variability.…”
Section: Single-cell 5' Rna-tcr-cite-sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%