2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2011.01415.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double Lumen Aortic Arch or Persistence of Fifth Aortic Arch?- Report of a Case with No Associated Cardiac Defects and Literature Review

Abstract: Different vascular abnormalities have been reported under the denomination of "persistence of the fifth aortic arch." Detailed studies on experimental embryology raised the discussion about the existence of the fifth aortic arch as an embryological structure, both in humans and mammals. In 1969 the Van Praaghs described the occurrence of double left aortic arch, denominating such anomaly as persistence of the fifth arch. We describe here a female patient showing the presence of an anomalous vessel in parallel … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diagnoses of these three patients were ultimately correctly defined at the time of surgery. It is noteworthy that Weinberg type A PFAA may be misdiagnosed as double aortic arch (DAA), [ 21 ] Weinberg type B was usually misdiagnosed as IAA or CoA, and Weinberg type C may be diagnosed as APW. The evidence for PFAA diagnosis was the detection of an abnormal vascular connection on imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnoses of these three patients were ultimately correctly defined at the time of surgery. It is noteworthy that Weinberg type A PFAA may be misdiagnosed as double aortic arch (DAA), [ 21 ] Weinberg type B was usually misdiagnosed as IAA or CoA, and Weinberg type C may be diagnosed as APW. The evidence for PFAA diagnosis was the detection of an abnormal vascular connection on imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although frequently associated with several cardiac defects, such as coarctation or interruption of the aorta, patent ductus arteriosus, tetralogy of Fallot, atrioventricular septal defect, truncus arteriosus, pulmonary and tricuspid atresia, this anomaly can also be found alone. 3,8 The clinical presentation of double-lumen aortic arch depends on the type of connection and presence of associated anomalies. Type I, as reported here, is the most common form, usually of no clinical significance.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Types II and III have positive hemodynamic consequences, by providing an alternative systemic arch in case of coarctation or aortic arch interruption (type II), and by acting as a systemic-pulmonary shunt when associated with pulmonary or tricuspid atresia (type III). 3,[6][7][8] In the present case, both arches ran on the same side of the trachea and, unlike the classical double aortic arch, which involves both trachea and esophagus, and does not result in a vascular ring. 6 Thus, it may correspond to a non-classical double arch possibly secondary to the presence of collaterals between the fourth and sixth artery arches, as described by Gupta et.al.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations