Double Nominative and Double Accusative Constructions

Integration of Verbal and Constructional Information in the Second Language Processing of English Dative Constructions

“…Korean, a SOV language, has relatively less rigid word order due to its case-marking system, thereby allowing the case-marked preverbal elements in the dative construction to freely scramble within the clause as long as the construction preserves the meaning of transfer (Sohn, 1999). For instance, the noun phrases bearing the recipient and theme roles can switch their positions, as in (1a) and (1b) (Yoon, 2015). As the recipient is consistently marked by the dative marker -eykey, which roughly translates into the English preposition to, the Korean dative sentences in (1) are most closely associated with the English PD construction.…”

Exploring VP/vP Preposing in Multiple Nominative Constructions

“…J.-H Yoon (1987Yoon ( , 1990, J.-Y. Yoon (1989), Schutze (1997, Kim (2001), Jung (2001), O'Grady (1991, Cho (1999), Vermulen (2005) c. topic-subject approach: NP1 (Topic) NP2 (subject) Im (1972), Li & Tompson (1976), Sohn (1981), Suh (1996) d. subject-adjunct approach: NP1 (subject) NP2 (adjunct) O'Grady (1991), Cho (1999) The function of nominative marked NPs is a non-trivial issue and each type of approach has insightful points, but this paper does not directly discuss the (dis)advantage of each approach.…”

“…6) Yoon (2015:80) also indicates that when MNCs are paraphrased as sentences containing a possessive marker -uy, they are called Possessor Type. Yoon (2015) discusses three types of MNCs: Possessor type, adjunct type & nominative object type. Among adjunct type MNCs given in Yoon (2015), only type-token types illustrated in (4b) are non-possession types under our proposal since the following adjunct type appears to allow genitive case alternation (contra Yoon's judgment): (i) a. Enehak-i/uy chwicik-i elyepta.…”

“…Yoon (2015) discusses three types of MNCs: Possessor type, adjunct type & nominative object type. Among adjunct type MNCs given in Yoon (2015), only type-token types illustrated in (4b) are non-possession types under our proposal since the following adjunct type appears to allow genitive case alternation (contra Yoon's judgment): (i) a. Enehak-i/uy chwicik-i elyepta. Linguistics-Nom/Gen employment-Nom difficult '(It is) in linguistics (that) getting employed is difficult.…”

“…The first nominative NP, by contrast, displays a full range of "grammatical subject" properties. For example, as noted in the previous literature, it can serve as a controller of subject honorification (for extensive discussion, see Hong 1997, Yoon 2009, 2015:…”