2003
DOI: 10.1137/s0895479802392989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double Ordering and Fill-In for the LU Factorization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the node-centroid algorithm we have experimented with using values of λ in the range [0. 8,1] and values of α in the range [1.5, 2.5]. Our experience was that the bandwidths were not very sensitive to the precise choice of λ, and for most examples 0.85 gave results that were within three percent of the best.…”
Section: Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For the node-centroid algorithm we have experimented with using values of λ in the range [0. 8,1] and values of α in the range [1.5, 2.5]. Our experience was that the bandwidths were not very sensitive to the precise choice of λ, and for most examples 0.85 gave results that were within three percent of the best.…”
Section: Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The algorithm proceeds by alternating between ordering the rows in decreasing order and ordering the columns in decreasing order. The authors [1] show that this converges to a limit and call it a "double ordering." Following reverse CuthillMcKee, they reverse the converged ordering.…”
Section: Relaxed Double Orderingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations