“…Contrary to high-motion joints, arthrodesis of low-motion joints such as the PIPJ can result in a full return to athletic performance (Watkins, 1996;Zubrod and Schneider, 2005;Lischer and Auer, 2012). Different arthrodesis techniques of the PIPJ have been reported: two diverging 4.5 or 5.5 mm transarticular cortical screws placed in lag fashion (TCS-LF) (Herthel et al, 2016), three parallel 4.5 or 5.5 mm TCS-LF (Read et al, 2005;Carmalt et al, 2010), a combination of dynamic compression plate (DCP) with two 5.5 mm TCS-LF (Sod et al, 2011), a combination of limited-contact dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP) with two 5.5 mm TCS-LF (Rocconi et al, 2015), a combination of locking compression plate (LCP) with two 5.5 mm TCS-LF (Sod et al, 2011;Sakai et al, 2018), double DCP or LCP plating (Cra- , 1995;McCormick and Watkins, 2017) and a combination of a three-hole proximal interphalangeal locking compression plate (PIP plate) with two 5.5 mm TCS-LF (Zoppa et al, 2011;Ahern et al, 2013). The successful outcome of an arthrodesis procedure depends on the method used, the limb affected, the breed of the horse and the underlying pathology present (Schaer et al, 2001;Zubrod and Schneider, 2005;Knox and Watkins, 2006;Sod et al, 2011;Zoppa et al, 2011;Lischer and Auer, 2012;Ahern et al, 2013;Rocconi et al, 2015;Herthel et al, 2016;Sakai et al, 2018).…”