2017
DOI: 10.1364/ao.56.007053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double-pulse 157  μm integrated path differential absorption lidar ground validation for atmospheric carbon dioxide measurement

Abstract: A ground-based double-pulse integrated path differential absorption (IPDA) instrument for carbon dioxide (CO) concentration measurements at 1572 nm has been developed. A ground experiment was implemented under different conditions with a known wall located about 1.17 km away acting as the scattering hard target. Off-/offline testing of a laser transmitter was conducted to estimate the instrument systematic and random errors. Results showed a differential absorption optical depth (DAOD) offset of 0.0046 existin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that values of parameters presented in Han G et al [33] are the requirements of the CO 2 -IPDA LIDAR. The recent development of that sensor is described in Du J et al [47]. Figure A1 shows the schematic diagram of the CO 2 -IPDA LIDAR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth noting that values of parameters presented in Han G et al [33] are the requirements of the CO 2 -IPDA LIDAR. The recent development of that sensor is described in Du J et al [47]. Figure A1 shows the schematic diagram of the CO 2 -IPDA LIDAR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The requirement on ranging ability is very stringent according to Table 2. Du et.al have demonstrated a ranging accuracy of~1.5 m by using their CO 2 -IPDA LIDAR prototype in 2017 [47], indicating that the assumption of this Table 1 on ranging accuracy is realistic. Referring to Singh's work [48], ε i s , the systematic error due to a specific factor F i , can be expressed as:…”
Section: Systematic Errorsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The comparisons between simulated pseudo XCO 2 and ground-based and airborne validation experiments also show a good consistency. In 2017, Du et al carried out the ground validation experiment of IPDA lidar utilizing a wall as a reflected hard target that was 1.17 km away [34]. XCO 2 data were measured in the limited path and compared with the measurement data of an in situ ultraportable greenhouse gas analyzer (UGGA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed system parameters are shown in Table 1. The prototype of spaceborne AC-IPDA lidar have been validated by ground base and airborne experiments in 2017 and 2019, respectively [34,35]. The laser transmitter subsystem is mainly composed of a seeder laser, a frequency stabilization system, and a pulsed laser.…”
Section: Conflicts Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade, many studies have been done on the use of doubled-pulsed IPDA lidar to measure CO2 or CH4 atmospheric content from space [8][9][10] and many IPDA ground based and airborne demonstrators are been developed around the word by DLR [11][12], NASA Langley [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] and JPL [21][22], NIST [23][24], Tokyo Metropolitan University [25][26] or Chinese Academy of Sciences [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%