2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.09.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double-sided battle: The role of ethylene during Monilinia spp. infection in peach at different phenological stages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Along this line, ACS2 and ACO1 , involved in system 2 ET production 32 , were overexpressed in inoculated immature tissues. Previous studies have reported on a similar modulation of ET biosynthesis by the pathogen 33 . However, after 24 hpi, ethylene levels in inoculated immature fruit fell to control levels, and the fruit remained resistant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Along this line, ACS2 and ACO1 , involved in system 2 ET production 32 , were overexpressed in inoculated immature tissues. Previous studies have reported on a similar modulation of ET biosynthesis by the pathogen 33 . However, after 24 hpi, ethylene levels in inoculated immature fruit fell to control levels, and the fruit remained resistant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…For symptom analysis, inoculated fruit was imaged at the set time points. Ethylene production of both mock and M. laxa inoculated immature and mature fruit was determined, as described by Baró-Montel 33 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in a recent study aiming to explore the role of ethylene during Monilinia spp. infection has been proposed that brown rot agents try to suppress ethylene biosynthesis aiming to an inhibition of fruit defense reactions 62 . The different level of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase in the present work might be due to the spatial and temporal action of ethylene that was produced both during fruit-pathogen interactions and peach fruit ripening process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, an inhibitory effect of chlorogenic and neochlorogenic acids, compounds that tend to be higher in unripe fruit (Bostock et al, 1999), had been reported as crucial for M. laxa pathogenicity by interfering with fungal melanin biosynthesis (Villarino et al, 2011). Regarding the molecular determinants of the fruit ripening-associated changes in brown rot susceptibility, scarce information is relatively available (Baro´-Montel et al, 2019). Guidarelli et al (2014) compared the gene expression profile between susceptible (two weeks before the pit hardening) and resistant (pit hardening) peach fruit developmental stages, finding noteworthy changes in phenylpropanoid and jasmonate-related genes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guidarelli et al (2014) compared the gene expression profile between susceptible (two weeks before the pit hardening) and resistant (pit hardening) peach fruit developmental stages, finding noteworthy changes in phenylpropanoid and jasmonate-related genes. In addition, a recent study has pointed out the differential role that ethylene plays in the interaction of Monilinia spp.-stone fruit (Baro´-Montel et al, 2019). Accordingly, ethylene might have an effect not only on inducing defence responses to both abiotic and biotic stress in the plant, but on promoting susceptibility to certain fruit pathogens (Chague´et al, 2006;Shigenaga and Argueso, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%