Vinblastine and its
derivatives used in clinics as antitumor drugs
often cause drug resistance and some serious side effects; thus, it
is necessary to study new vinblastine analogues with strong anticancer
cytotoxicity and low toxicity. We designed a dimer molecule using
two vindoline-bonded dimer vindoline (DVB) and studied its interaction
with α,β-tubulin through the double-sided adhesive mechanism
to explore its anticancer cytotoxicity. In our work, DVB was docked
into the interface between α-tubulin and β-tubulin to
construct a complex protein structure, and then it was simulated for
100 ns using the molecular dynamics technology to become a stable
and refined complex protein structure. Based on such a refined structure,
the quantum chemistry at the level of the MP2/6-31G(d,p) method was
used to calculate the binding energies for DVB interacting with respective
residues. By the obtained binding energies, the active site residues
for interaction with DVB were found. Up to 20 active sites of residues
within α,β-tubulin interacting with DVB are labeled in
β-Asp179, β-Glu207, β-Tyr210, β-Asp211, β-Phe214,
β-Pro222, β-Tyr224, and β-Leu227 and α-Asn249,
α-Arg308, α-Lys326, α-Asn329, α-Ala333, α-Thr334,
α-Lys336, α-Lys338, α-Arg339, α-Ser340, α-Thr349,
and α-Phe351. The total binding energy between DVB and α,β-tubulin
is about −251.0 kJ·mol
–1
. The sampling
average force potential (PMF) method was further used to study the
dissociation free energy (Δ
G
) along the separation
trajectory of α,β-tubulin under the presence of DVB based
on the refined structure of DVB with α,β-tubulin. Because
of the presence of DVB within the interface between α- and β-tubulin,
Δ
G
is 252.3 kJ·mol
–1
. In contrast to the absence of DVB, the separation of pure β-tubulin
needs a free energy of 196.9 kJ·mol
–1
. The
data show that the presence of DVB adds more 55.4 kJ·mol
–1
of Δ
G
to hinder the normal
separation of α,β-tubulin. Compared to vinblastine existing,
the free energy required for the separation of α,β-tubulin
is 220.5 kJ·mol
–1
. Vinblastine and DVB can
both be considered through the same double-sided adhesive mechanism
to give anticancer cytotoxicity. Because of the presence of DVB, a
larger free energy is needed for the separation of α,β-tubulin,
which suggests that DVB should have stronger anticancer cytotoxicity
than vinblastine and shows that DVB has a broad application prospect.