2011
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1118927109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double-strand break motions shift radiation risk notions?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability to repair DSBs determines the sensitivity of mammalian cells to IR (18,20). The recruitment of several proteins to the damage site is the initial cellular response to DSBs, through which γ-H2AX focus formation is one of the earliest event (19,21). In our study, exogenous TOB1 reduced the amount of γ-H2AX foci induced by IR in the HBE cells (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ability to repair DSBs determines the sensitivity of mammalian cells to IR (18,20). The recruitment of several proteins to the damage site is the initial cellular response to DSBs, through which γ-H2AX focus formation is one of the earliest event (19,21). In our study, exogenous TOB1 reduced the amount of γ-H2AX foci induced by IR in the HBE cells (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…A double-strand break (DSB) of DNA, the main biological target of IR, determines mutation or cell death after IR (17)(18)(19). The ability to repair DSBs determines the sensitivity of mammalian cells to IR (18,20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some pathways for DSB repair can mis-rejoin DNA ends from different break sites, thus creating chromosome aberrations. The influence of initial distance between DSB sites on the probability of mis-rejoining is under debate, as well as the possibility of mechanisms bringing DSB sites into closer vicinity during damage processing1. Estimates on break interaction distances based on biophysical modelling vary between 100 nm and several μm234.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%