2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.09.082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DoubletDecon: Deconvoluting Doublets from Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing Data

Abstract: Highlights d DoubletDecon uses deconvolution to identify and remove doublets in scRNA-seq data d Retention of doublets can confound data analysis and cell population identification d DoubletDecon limits erroneous removal of transitional and progenitor cells d The algorithm identifies unique doublets relative to alternative approaches

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
141
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
141
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examine the clustering merging heatmap that was automatically generated in conjunction with previously identified cluster labels to assess the appropriateness of merging. The example below in Figure 1 shows the result of various ρ' values in the mouse hematopoietic progenitor dataset from Figure 3 of the original DoubletDecon paper (DePasquale et al, 2019). Figure 1A shows no cluster merging, which may cause a loss of sensitivity in DoubletDecon due to the biological similarity of the HSCP-1 and HSCP-2 clusters as well as the similarity of the monocyte-dendritic cell precursor (MDP) and monocyte progenitor (Mono) clusters.…”
Section: Step-by-step Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Examine the clustering merging heatmap that was automatically generated in conjunction with previously identified cluster labels to assess the appropriateness of merging. The example below in Figure 1 shows the result of various ρ' values in the mouse hematopoietic progenitor dataset from Figure 3 of the original DoubletDecon paper (DePasquale et al, 2019). Figure 1A shows no cluster merging, which may cause a loss of sensitivity in DoubletDecon due to the biological similarity of the HSCP-1 and HSCP-2 clusters as well as the similarity of the monocyte-dendritic cell precursor (MDP) and monocyte progenitor (Mono) clusters.…”
Section: Step-by-step Methods Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…min_uniqthis parameter, set to 4 by default, indicates the minimum number of genes that must be uniquely expressed per potential doublet cluster to be 'rescued' during the final step of DoubletDecon. When using the full gene list (when 'useFull' is TRUE), the 'min_uniq' value should be set to 30, which was guided by the verified mouse non-doublet evaluation dataset in the original DoubletDecon publication (see STAR Methods for more details) (DePasquale et al, 2019). These values were chosen to correct for multiple tests and reduce the risk of false positive genes labeled as uniquely expressed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ambient RNA, from disrupted ("broken") cells may be a major source of contamination, as recently described 34 . If true, this would occur before the library preparation and sequencing steps, would cause only a modest expression of the gene, and would not be detectable by current doublet correcting mechanisms 12,35 . This method of contamination might have implications for Human Cell Atlas studies, as we demonstrated it clearly affects cross-tissue comparisons of common cell types in Tabula Muris 31,36 .…”
Section: Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…High data quality in single-cell analyses depends on the ability to discern which droplets contain single cells [31][32][33] . Previously, it has been difficult to attain predictable single-cell loading in DEs due to droplet polydispersity 39,47 .…”
Section: Device Design and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This capability would enable new opportunities for single-cell analysis. First, isolating and sequencing only those droplets containing cells would dramatically lower assay costs 15 while increasing sequencing accuracy and depth [31][32][33] . Second, encapsulated cells could be isolated based on phenotypes not currently measurable with standard fluorescence-activated cell sorting 34,35 (FACS), such as enzymatic turnover, presence of secreted molecules, or quantification of proteins lacking cell surface markers 17 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%