In this short paper I provide a justificatory argument for the importance of the endeavour exemplified by the papers that comprise the remainder of this special issue. I suggest that consideration and assessment of the origins of the concept of the Rule of Law not only matters, but also that it is a practice that is often neglected. Further, I suggest our failure to take account of the origins of the Rule of Law-by continuing to simply innovate around the idea of the contemporary understanding of the concept-limits the concept's future development and will, potentially, not reflect faithfully the ideas from which our contemporary understanding of the concept is ultimately derived. As a result of this failure, we risk the (unintentional) imposition of a selective approach in the interpretation and application of the concept of the Rule of Law in the future. Increasing our focus on the origins of the Rule of Law will not only illuminate the rationale for and behind the operation of the concept, but it will also expose aspects of the concept that are no longer considered or included-in contemporary conceptions of the idea-and will ensure our future solutions are not curtailed. Keywords Rule of Law Á History Á Origin Á Path dependence As asserted in the opening sentence of this paper: origins matter. This paper's origin can be traced to a workshop held at the University of Edinburgh in May, 2016. Since that time, my initial ideas have been modified and improved by a number of individuals. I have been fortunate enough to read the work of the four authors contributing to this special issue in advance of putting pen to paper and their ideas have shaped the arguments I present. In addition, I have been fortunate enough to receive comments, thoughts, suggestions and a great deal of encouragement from my co-editor Neil Walker as well as from Brian Tamanaha, Martin Krygier and Ronald Janse. The precise formulation of my argument has also been greatly improved by several discussions with Lucas Miotto. Despite all of the assistance I have been afforded, any errors or omissions originate with and should be attributed to me alone.