2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-61753-4_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dow Theory’s Peak-and-Trough Analysis Justified

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Which value a should we choose for this modified intermediate dependence: general idea. In our analysis, we can use an observation (made in the 1980s by B. S. Tsirelson [16]) that in many cases, when we reconstruct the signal from the noisy data, and we assume that the resulting signal belongs to a certain class, the reconstructed signal is often an extreme point from this class; see also [11,15]. The paper [16] provided the following geometric explanation to this fact: namely, when we reconstruct a signal from a mixture of a signal and a Gaussian noise, then the maximum likelihood estimation (a traditional statistical technique; see, e.g., [14]) means that we look for a signal which belongs to the (a priori determined) class of signals, and which is the closest -in the sense of the usual Euclidean distance -to the observed signal-plus-noise combination.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Which value a should we choose for this modified intermediate dependence: general idea. In our analysis, we can use an observation (made in the 1980s by B. S. Tsirelson [16]) that in many cases, when we reconstruct the signal from the noisy data, and we assume that the resulting signal belongs to a certain class, the reconstructed signal is often an extreme point from this class; see also [11,15]. The paper [16] provided the following geometric explanation to this fact: namely, when we reconstruct a signal from a mixture of a signal and a Gaussian noise, then the maximum likelihood estimation (a traditional statistical technique; see, e.g., [14]) means that we look for a signal which belongs to the (a priori determined) class of signals, and which is the closest -in the sense of the usual Euclidean distance -to the observed signal-plus-noise combination.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%