1976
DOI: 10.1038/262060a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Down's syndrome and related abnormalities in an area of high background radiation in coastal Kerala

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
40
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
40
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison of the frequencies of Down syndrome in HLNR (65/86,290) and NLNR (39/ 55,250) areas yielded an RR of 1.07 (95 % CI, 0.72-1.59) and did not provide evidence to suggest any impact of HLNR on the prevalence of Down syndrome. The findings are in disagreement with an earlier study (Kochupillai et al 1976) based on an adult population survey that reported higher prevalence of Down syndrome in HLNRA with no Down syndrome case having been recorded in the control population.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Comparison of the frequencies of Down syndrome in HLNR (65/86,290) and NLNR (39/ 55,250) areas yielded an RR of 1.07 (95 % CI, 0.72-1.59) and did not provide evidence to suggest any impact of HLNR on the prevalence of Down syndrome. The findings are in disagreement with an earlier study (Kochupillai et al 1976) based on an adult population survey that reported higher prevalence of Down syndrome in HLNRA with no Down syndrome case having been recorded in the control population.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…There were reports of a higher prevalence (12/ 12,918 in HLNRA vs. 0/5,938 in control area) of Down syndrome in HLNRA (Kochupillai et al 1976) and a higher frequency of mitochondrial DNA mutation (22/595 in HLNR vs. 1/200 in NLNR; P<.01, likelihood ratio chisquare) in saliva samples (Forster et al 2002). Down syndrome report (Kochupillai et al 1976) was criticized for design issues (Sundaram 1977). Historic dosimetry and small sample size especially from the control area were some of the weaknesses of the mitochondrial DNA study-the risk of mutation in HLNR area relative to control area, as estimated from the data was 7.39 with a very wide 95 % CI of 1.003 to 54.5, reflecting lack of precision in the estimate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The biologically effective radiation dose received by the coastal population is 10,000-12,000 Sv per year, approximately 10 times greater than the worldwide average. Studies in Kerala on rat morphology (6), Down's syndrome (7,8), chromosomal aberrations (9), and congenital malformations (10) could not conclusively reveal significant abnormalities in the local residents, and direct DNA sequencing has never been performed in intergenerational radiation studies in Kerala, or indeed elsewhere in the world.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concentrations of dissolved solids greater than 500 mg/L (milligrams per liter) may impart an unpleasant taste to the water and may not quench thirst as well as water containing concentrations less than 500 mg/L (McKee and Wolf, 1971). Water from well 2 ( fig.…”
Section: Dissolved Sol Idsmentioning
confidence: 99%