1976
DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1976.tb04903.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Down's Syndrome With X0/Xy Mosaicism

Abstract: A 5-month-old Chinese infant with combined Down's syndrome and X0/XY mosaicism is presented. The phenotypical features of mongolism are classical and unmodified. The somatic effects of X0/XY mosaicism is that of incomplete masculinization with short phallus, hypospadias, bifid scrotum, urogenital sinus, and bilateral extra-abdominal infantile testicles. These features together with the absence of internal female organs and signs of Turner's syndrome in this patient are different from the previous reported case… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DUT syndrome is the most frequent among them and is estimated to occur at a rate of one in 2 million newborns [McCorquodale et al, 1985]. Of 24 individuals with DUT syndrome reported [Townes et al, 1975;Villaverde and da Silva, 1975;Yeung and Yang, 1976;Gattrad, 1981;MacFaul et al, 1981;Mc-Corquodale et al, 1985;Jaruratanasirikul and Jinorose, 1995], 19 involved intracellular double aneuploidy (XO,+21), 2 had double mosaic aneuploid cell lines (XO/XX,+21) [Grosse et al, 1971;Hustinx et al, 1974], and the remaining 3 were not analyzed chromosomally. Mosaicism with X/XX,+21 cell lines may arise from somatic chromosomal loss or gain [Robinson et al, 1995].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DUT syndrome is the most frequent among them and is estimated to occur at a rate of one in 2 million newborns [McCorquodale et al, 1985]. Of 24 individuals with DUT syndrome reported [Townes et al, 1975;Villaverde and da Silva, 1975;Yeung and Yang, 1976;Gattrad, 1981;MacFaul et al, 1981;Mc-Corquodale et al, 1985;Jaruratanasirikul and Jinorose, 1995], 19 involved intracellular double aneuploidy (XO,+21), 2 had double mosaic aneuploid cell lines (XO/XX,+21) [Grosse et al, 1971;Hustinx et al, 1974], and the remaining 3 were not analyzed chromosomally. Mosaicism with X/XX,+21 cell lines may arise from somatic chromosomal loss or gain [Robinson et al, 1995].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%