2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.12.1709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Down-State Model of the KvAP Full Channel

Abstract: we set out to determine the interaction footprint of the VSD on the PD using ESEEM spectroscopy. We have previously demonstrated that deuterium ESEEM is well suited to investigate the interaction of membrane proteins with their surrounding environment. In the present study, we determine the water accessibility profile of the KvAP PD in the presence and absence of the VSD. We show that a region of the PD near the monomer interface demonstrates decreased deuterium coupling in the presence of the VSD compared to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Disulfide bond formation between R1C and I241C in S1 or I287C in S2 in the closed state (Campos et al, 2007) also supports close proximity of R1 and E283 in the resting state. Several structural models of Shaker , Kv1.2 and KvAP channels in the resting state have been developed using these experimental data to constrain the position of R1 close to E283 (Yarov-Yarovoy et al, 2006; Campos et al, 2007; Pathak et al, 2007; Nishizawa and Nishizawa, 2008; Schow et al, 2010; Vargas et al, 2011). Using molecular dynamics simulations to calculate the gating charge transferred when the Kv1.2 S4 segment moves from a resting position, where R1 and E283 interact, to an activated conformation, where R4 and E283 interact, resulted in a value of ∼12–12.7 e 0 (Khalili-Araghi et al, 2010), which is in good agreement with experimental findings (Bezanilla, 2000).…”
Section: Regulation Of Voltage Sensor Movement In Herg and Shaker Chamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disulfide bond formation between R1C and I241C in S1 or I287C in S2 in the closed state (Campos et al, 2007) also supports close proximity of R1 and E283 in the resting state. Several structural models of Shaker , Kv1.2 and KvAP channels in the resting state have been developed using these experimental data to constrain the position of R1 close to E283 (Yarov-Yarovoy et al, 2006; Campos et al, 2007; Pathak et al, 2007; Nishizawa and Nishizawa, 2008; Schow et al, 2010; Vargas et al, 2011). Using molecular dynamics simulations to calculate the gating charge transferred when the Kv1.2 S4 segment moves from a resting position, where R1 and E283 interact, to an activated conformation, where R4 and E283 interact, resulted in a value of ∼12–12.7 e 0 (Khalili-Araghi et al, 2010), which is in good agreement with experimental findings (Bezanilla, 2000).…”
Section: Regulation Of Voltage Sensor Movement In Herg and Shaker Chamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, this structure provides us with a good idea of what a closed Kv channel looks like, mostly in the pore region. Hence, models of the resting states of other channels (Hv1, NaChBac, and the plant KAT channel) have been derived from homology modeling methods, using among others, the MlotiK structure as templates (Shafrir et al, 2008; Schow et al, 2010; DeCaen et al, 2011; Wood et al, 2012). All these models bear similarities, as they place S4 inwards.…”
Section: Molecular Insight Into the Function Of Kv Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%