2016
DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2015-0651
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Downhill progressive landslides in long natural slopes: triggering agents and landslide phases modeled with a finite difference method

Abstract: A large landslide in Tuve (Gothenburg, Sweden 1977) initiated the development of a model for slope stability analysis taking the deformation-softening of soft sensitive clays into consideration. The model studies triggering agents and five phases in progressive slope failure are identified: (1) in-situ, (2) disturbance, (3) unstable 'dynamic', (4) transitory (or permanent) equilibrium, and (5) 'global' failure. The clay resistance in these phases may differ widely; mostly due to different rates of loading.Two… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Failures of the newly generated backscarps occur until a final stable scarp is formed. The translational progressive landslide develops in a very different way; that is, a shear surface parallel to the ground surface develops first and then the soil mass above the formed failure surface moves downhill (Bernander et al 2016;Wang 2019). In a spread, a shear surface along the ground surface forms as that in a translational progressive landslide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failures of the newly generated backscarps occur until a final stable scarp is formed. The translational progressive landslide develops in a very different way; that is, a shear surface parallel to the ground surface develops first and then the soil mass above the formed failure surface moves downhill (Bernander et al 2016;Wang 2019). In a spread, a shear surface along the ground surface forms as that in a translational progressive landslide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upslope loading might significantly affect the failure of slopes, which has been observed in the field and verified with numerical modeling for monotonic loading (Bernander 2000;Bernander et al 2016;Wang et al 2013;Dey et al 2016a;Wang and Hawlader 2017) and dynamic loading (Seed and Wilson, 1967;Barnhardt et al 2000;Kourkoulis et al 2010). Figure 10 shows the formation of failure planes when a uniform surcharge q = 80 kPa exists at 100 m distance from the crest.…”
Section: Slope-iii: With An Upslope Distributed Loadmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Numerical simulation is becoming an important approach for landslide research, especially its stability analysis, failure mechanisms and motion processes. For instance, mesh-based methods, such as the finite difference method (FDM) and the finite element method (FEM) have been widely applied in slope stability analysis (Ding et al, 2012;Chen et al, 2019), failure mechanism analysis (Maihemuti et al, 2016;Xiong et al, 2018), and failure process simulation (Bernander et al, 2016;Tang et al, 2017). Recently, mesh-free methods have been rapidly developed and widely applied due to their unique capability and advantages to handle the problems with large deformation and free surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%