2003 IEEE 58th Vehicular Technology Conference. VTC 2003-Fall (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37484) 2003
DOI: 10.1109/vetecf.2003.1285147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Downlink performance of a CDMA system with distributed base station

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative strategy is to try to reduce the overall transmit power (and hence othercell interference) using distributed antennas, which has the additional merit of providing better coverage and increasing battery life [2]. Although distributed antennas systems (DAS) were originally introduced to simply cover the dead spots in indoor wireless communications [3], recent studies have identified other potential advantages such as reduced power and increased system capacity [4]- [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An alternative strategy is to try to reduce the overall transmit power (and hence othercell interference) using distributed antennas, which has the additional merit of providing better coverage and increasing battery life [2]. Although distributed antennas systems (DAS) were originally introduced to simply cover the dead spots in indoor wireless communications [3], recent studies have identified other potential advantages such as reduced power and increased system capacity [4]- [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also few papers that consider the advantages of DAS in a multicell context. A recent paper [9] addressed downlink performance of code division multiple access (CDMA) DAS in a multiple cell environment, but it relied on computer simulations and only investigated SIR levels perceived at mobile stations. Computer simulations are useful but mathematical analysis enables us to efficiently identify the key design parameters and to understand their effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All mobiles are assumed to transmit at the maximum power, and the power is subdivided equally among all subcarriers allocated to the mobile. The channel gain over subcarrier i corresponding to user k is given by: (8) In Equation (8), the first factor captures propagation loss, with κ a constant chosen to be 128.1 dB, d k the distance in km from mobile k to the nearest RRH in a distributed BS scenario, or to the BS in a centralised BS scenario, and λ the path loss exponent, which is set to a value of 3.76. The second factor, ξ k,i , captures log-normal shadowing with an 8 dB standard deviation, whereas the last factor, F k,i , corresponds to Rayleigh fading with a Rayleigh parameter b such that E[b 2 ] = 1.…”
Section: Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…was conducted in [2]. Other proposed systems include: an enhanced ad-hoc (Global System for Mobile communications) GSM network [3], a Unified Cellular and Ad-Hoc Network architecture using 802.11-based peerto-peer links [4], an Integrated Cellular and Ad Hoc Relaying system which dynamically balances the traffic heterogeneity among cells [5], a Multihop Cellular system where every mobile user participates in relaying [6], a UTRA TDD system augmented by Intelligent Relaying capability [7], fixed relay systems [8] - [9], and wired relay systems [10]. The relay routing was researched by [11] and the DownLink (DL) throughput in [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%