Downregulation of miR-221-3p by LncRNA TUG1 Promoting the Healing of Closed Tibial Fractures in Mice

Abstract

Objective. To probe into the effect of LncRNA TUG1 on the healing of closed tibial fracture in mice. Methods. The closed tibial fracture model of mice was established, selecting the mouse osteoblast line MC3T3-E1, with the cells separated into four groups. The expression levels of TUG1 and miR-221-3p were determined by RT-qPCR analysis, with the targeting relationship between TUG1 and miR-221-3p authenticated by dual luciferase reporter (DLR) assay, detection of cell migration (CM) ability based on Transwell cell migration (TCM) assay, and cell proliferation (CP) acquired by cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8). Results. Prediction results of the target gene by bioinformatics software showed that miR-221-3p had binding sites with the 3 ′ -UTR of TUG1, and DLR assay authenticated the targeting relationship between LncRNA TUG1 and miR-221-3p. Downregulation of TUG1 inhibited osteoblast CP and CM and promoted osteoblast cell apoptosis (CA). Cell cycle analysis indicated that miR-221-3p provoked cell cycle arrest in G1 stage of MC3T3-E1 cells. The siLncRNA-NC group had higher anticyclin D1 and D3 levels than the siLncRNA TUG1 group, with a lower CA rate in the former, implying that miR-221-3p overexpression inhibited osteoblast CP and CM and LncRNA TUG1 inhibited CA. Downregulation of miR-221-3p partly reversed the retardation out of downregulating TUG1 on osteoblast CP and CM. Bcl-2 level was higher in the LncRNA TUG1 group compared to the siLncRNA TUG1 and miR-221-3p overexpression groups, with remarkably lower SDF-1 level in the miR-221-3p overexpression group than those in the control, miRNA-NC, and LncRNA TUG1 groups. Conclusion. The downregulation of miR-221-3p by LncRNA TUG1 can promote the healing of closed tibial fractures in mice.

Retracted: Downregulation of miR-221-3p by LncRNA TUG1 Promoting the Healing of Closed Tibial Fractures in Mice

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Manipulated or compromised peer review …”

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”