2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.najef.2015.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Downside/upside price spillovers between precious metals: A vine copula approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies for advanced nations with similar findings areReboredo (2013),Flavin et al (2014), Beckman et al(2015)andBredin et al (2015).4 We follow Reboredo (2013),Yang and Hamori (2014),Reboredo and Ugolini (2015) in our approach. These papers examined the role of gold as a safe haven asset against developed economies stock market returns and currencies, however, we focus on emerging market and…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Other studies for advanced nations with similar findings areReboredo (2013),Flavin et al (2014), Beckman et al(2015)andBredin et al (2015).4 We follow Reboredo (2013),Yang and Hamori (2014),Reboredo and Ugolini (2015) in our approach. These papers examined the role of gold as a safe haven asset against developed economies stock market returns and currencies, however, we focus on emerging market and…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Few studies analyzed asymmetric tail dependence. Reboredo and Ugolini [22] examined downside and upside price spillovers between precious metals by employing a vine copula model and measuring downside and upside value-at-risk and conditional value-at-risk. They revealed that the interdependency is different across precious metals, showing different average and tail dependence features.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the seminal paper [10], the PCC was used to model the dependency structure of a portfolio consisting of two stock and two bond return indices. Since then, these constructions have been used for equities [48,53,[61][62][63], interest rates [48,64,65], exchange rates [61,[66][67][68][69], electricity prices and other commodities [61,[70][71][72][73][74] and housing prices [75]. In most of these studies, the PCC shows excellent performance compared to alternative dependency models.…”
Section: Market Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%